MEDIATION VS. MEDIATOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v7i4.835Keywords:
mediation, conflict, conciliation, procedure, alternative.Abstract
The title of this paper was suggested by the confusion existing even among certainmediators about what mediation is and what it represents actually.
Is mediation “a different type of justice” or, otherwise, it is “an alternative to
traditional justice”? Is mediation a procedure still unknown to the public and professionals?
Is mediation insufficiently publicised? Is there a background of distrust about this procedure?
In this paper we are trying to answer these questions and suggest solutions likely to
determine the strengthening and promoting of the mediation procedure like a procedure both
efficient and necessary all the same.
References
D. Călin (coord.), Roxana Maria Lăcătuşu, Sanda Lungu, Culegere de Hotărâri judecătoreşti
pronunţate în materia medierii, “Universitară†Publishing House, Bucharest, 2011;
Group of authors, Medierea un demers eÅŸuat dar cu perspective, Convorbiri Juridice, no.6,
“Juridică Universitară†Publishing House, 2012;
Ph. D. Associate Professor L.B.Ciucă, Convorbiri juridice, no. 4, “Juridică Universitarăâ€
Publishing House, 2011;
Law 134/2010 on the New Civil Code of Procedure, republished in the Official Gazette of
Romania, nr. 545 of August 3rd, 2012;
Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 May 2008 on some
aspects of mediation in civil and commercial terms, Official Journal L 136, 24/05/2008;
Law No. 192 of 16 May 2006 regarding the mediation and establishing the mediator
profession, published in Official Gazette of Romania no. 441/22 May 2006.
www.csml909.ro
www.medierenet.ro
www.juridice.ro, http://mediatorsm.blogspot.ro
