WORKERS’ REPRESENTATIVES

Authors

  • Ada Hurbean

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v7i2.540

Keywords:

empoyee, representation, trade union, colective agreement, mandate, responsabilities

Abstract

This study deals with the institution representatives of the employees, the only
possibility, regulated by the law, to defense and promotion the interests of employees, in the
absence of a trade union representative at the level of the unit. Therefore, we are in the
presence of alternative to trade union representation, whereas, in principle, coexistence
between the two is out of the question.
Topics studied has known substantive changes with the entry into force of the Law No
40/2011, both in respect of the conditions of eligibility of representatives of the employees, as
well as in respect of measures of legal protection for them. Therefore, we want to do a
comparative overview of the old and new provisions equal in the matter.

Author Biography

Ada Hurbean

Law and Social Science Faculty, Legal and Administrative Science Deparment
“1 Decembrie 1918†University, Alba Iulia, Romania
*Corespondence Ada Hurbean, “1 Decembrie 1918†University, 5 Gabriel Bethlen St.,
510009, Alba Iulia, Romania

References

R. G. Cristescu, C. Cristescu, Codul muncii modificat si republicat. Analize ÅŸi soluţii, Hamagiu Pubishing House, 2011;

Lucia Uţă. Florentina. Rotaru, Simona Cristescu, Codul muncii adnotat. Vol. I. Art. 1-153, Hamagiu Pubishing House, 2008;

I. T. Åžtefanescu, Tratat de dreptul muncii, Wolters Kluwer Pubishing House, 2007;

Al. Å¢iclea, Reprezentanţii salariaţilor, in “Revista Română de Dreptul Muncii†Review, nr. 1/2004.

Downloads

Published

2013-07-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.