THE PROCEDURAL AND NORMATIVE OVERSIGHTS WHEN DOING A SURVEY REPORT. THE MEDICAL-LEGAL EXPERTISE VERSUS JUDICIAL SURVEY IN MEDICINE

Authors

  • Adrian-Marius Chipurici

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v7i2.536

Keywords:

expertise, medical-legal expert, medical judicial expert

Abstract

The study attempts to present an abnormality in the Romanian system of expertise.
I will pass in review the normative documents that regulate the medical-legal expert’s
activity and those that organize the activity of the judicial expert in medicine, ascertaining a
different way of approaching the two kinds of expertise, especially the criminal one, by the
bodies with judicial responsibilities. In the end, there are solutions advanced with a view to
normalizing the situation.

Author Biography

Adrian-Marius Chipurici

Law and Economics Faculty, Social Sciences Department,
Agora University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania
*Correspondence: Adrian Marius Chipurici, Agora University of Oradea,
8 Piaţa Tineretului St., Oradea, Romania

References

A. Buzaianu, Judicial and Extrajudicial Technical Expertise, “Nomina Lex†Publishing House, Timişoara, 2010;

V. Iftenie, D. Dermengiu, Legal Medicine, C.H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, 2009;

Romanian Criminal Procedure Code;

Government Ordinance no.1/2000 with subsequent additions and modifications;

Government Ordinance no. 2/2000 with subsequent additions and modifications;

V. T. Dragomirescu, Medical-legal Problems and Methodology, “Medical†Publishing House, Bucharest, 1980.

Downloads

Published

2013-07-01

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2013): Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences

Section

Section I. Juridical Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.