CHALLENGE FOR ANNULMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v13i2.3799Abstract
The challenge for annulment - an extraordinary legal remedy of withdrawal by which the parties or the prosecutor can obtain the cancellation of a court ruling in the cases exhaustively provided by law. It can be exercised for the purpose of withdrawing court rulings (judgments) that were pronounced in disregard of certain procedural rules, not for reasons of groundlessness. This article aims to highlight the object of the challenge for annulment, the persons who may advance a challenge for annulment, the conditions imposed by the law for the admissibility of such a challenge, and the possible solutions rendered by the court.References
PhD Prof. Ion Deleanu, Tratat de procedură civilă (Civil Procedure Treatise), Servo Sat Publishing House, 2000;
Florea Magureanu, Drept Procesual Civil Român (Romanian Civil Procedural Law), All Beck Publishing House, 1998;
Viorel Mihai Ciobanu, Gabriel Boroi, Traian Cornel Briciu, Drept Procesual civil (Civil Procedural Law), C.H.Beck Publishing House, 2011;
Sebastian Spinei, Reglementarea căilor de atac în dreptul procesual civil (The Regulation of Remedies in Civil Procedural Law), Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2013;
Civil Procedure Code - MJR official edition 2015;
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, drawn up within the Council of Europe, opened for signature in Rome, on 4 November 1950, which entered into force in September 1953;
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania (CCR) no. 483 of 23 June 2015, published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no. 633 of 20 August 2015, as well as Decision 673/2017, published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no. 92/2018 of 31 January 2018;
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania no. 1033 of 9 July 2009 regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Art. 318 of the Civil Procedure Code of 1865, published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no. 634/2009 of 25 September 2009;
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania no. 828 of 11 December 2018, which was published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no. 263 of 05 April 2019;
Decision no. 1163/2017 - High Court of Cassation and Justice - Civil Division I - published on scj.ro;
Decision no. 830/2017 pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice (HCCJ) - Civil Division I - Published in the HCCJ of 18 May 2017;
Decision no. 2/2007 regarding the examination of the second appeal in the interest of the law, filed by the General Prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, on the compatibility of participation in the adjudication of the application (motion) for revision or of the challenge for annulment of the judge who previously solved the case on the merits - High Court of Cassation and Justice - HCCJ - Published by the HCCJ on 15 January 2007- published on scj.ro;
Civil Decision no. 303/2016 pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice - Panel of 5 Judges - Published by the HCCJ on 31 October 2016 - published on scj.ro;
Decision no. 2546/2014 on financial rights - High Court of Cassation and Justice - Civil Division I - Published by the HCCJ on 02 October 2014;
Decision no. 525/2015 - High Court of Cassation and Justice - Civil Division I, published in the HCCJ of 19 February 2015, respectively Decision no. 706/2015 - High Court of Cassation and Justice - Civil Division II - Published in the HCCJ of 03 March 2015- published on scj.ro.
