OFFENSE - THE ONLY GROUND FOR CRIMINAL LIABILITY

Authors

  • Laura-Roxana Popoviciu Law and Economics Faculty, Social Sciences Department Agora University of Oradea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v8i4.1614

Abstract

This study aims to examine the offence as the only ground for criminal liability. Article 15, paragraph 2 of the Criminal code provides that: “offences are the only grounds for criminal liability”, which implies the existence of an act, which is detected by the bodies empowered under the law in the form required by law, and also this principle comes as a guarantee of the person’s freedom because, without committing an act provided for by the law as an offense, the criminal liability cannot exist.

The criminal liability is one of the fundamental institutions of the criminal law, together with the institution of the offence and of the sanction, set in the various provisions of the Criminal code.

As shown in the Criminal code, in Title II regarding the offence, there is a close interdependence among the three fundamental institutions. The offence, as a dangerous act prohibited by the criminal rule, attracts, by committing it, the criminal liability, and the criminal liability without a sanction would lack the object. It obliges the person who committed an offence to be held accountable for it in front of the judicial bodies, to bide the sanctions provided for by the law, and to execute the sanction that was applied.

The correlation is also vice-versa, meaning that the sanction, its implementation, cannot be justified only by the existence of the perpetrator’s criminal liability, and the criminal liability may not be based only on committing an offence.

The criminal liability is a form of the judicial liability and it represents the consequence of non-complying with the provision of the criminal rule. Indeed, the achievement of the rule of law, in general, and also the rule of the criminal law implies, from all the law’s recipients, a conduct according to the provisions of the law, for the normal evolution of the social relations.

References

 L. A. Lascu, Modalităţi de comitere a crimelor date în competenţa instanţelor penale internaţionale, Hamangiu Publishing House, Bucharest, 2013;

 L. D. Rath-Boşca, Resolving conflicts from the mediation point of view, in AIJJS no. 1/2013;

 V. Paşca, Course of criminal law. General part (Curs de drept penal. Partea generală), 2nd Edition in accordance with the modifications of the New Criminal code, Bucharest, Judicial Universe Publishing House, 2012;

 L. R. Popoviciu, Criminal Law. General part (Drept penal. Partea generală), Bucharest, Pro Universitaria Publishing House, 2011;

 Boroi, Criminal law. General part. According to the New Criminal Code (Drept penal. Partea generală. Conform Noului Cod penal), Bucharest, C. H. Beck Publishing House, 2010;

 G. Antoniu, Preliminary explanations of the new Criminal code (Explicaţii preliminare ale noului Cod penal), Bucharest, Judicial Universe Publishing House, 2010;

 C. Lee, A. Harris, Criminal Law Cases and Materials, Thomson & West Publishing House, Berkeley, 2009;

 C. Bulai, B. Bulai, Handbook of Criminal law. General part (Manual de Drept penal. Partea generală), Bucharest, Judicial Universe Publishing House, 2007;

 C-tin Mitrache, C. Mitrache, Romanian criminal law, general part (Drept penal român, partea generală), Bucharest, Judicial Universe Publishing House, 2006;

 Gh. Mihai, Law’s bases. The theory of judicial liability (Fundamentele dreptului. Teoria răspunderii juridice). C H. Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, 2006;

 Tănăsescu, C. Tănăsescu, G. Tănăsescu, General criminal law (Drept penal general), Bucharest, All Beck Publishing House, 2002;

 M. Basarab, Criminal law. General part (Drept penal. Partea generală), Volume I, Bucharest, Lumina Lex Publishing House, 1997;

 Gh. Boboş, Law’s general theory (Teoria generală a dreptului), Dacia Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca, 1994;

 C. Bulai, Criminal law (Drept penal), Volume III;

 M. Costin, Judicial liability in the law of R.S.R. (Răspunderea juridică în dreptul R.S.R.), Dacia Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca, 1974;

 M. Eliescu, Delict civil liability (Răspunderea civilă delictuală), Academiei R.S.R. Publishing House, Bucharest, 1972;

 Oancea, Criminal law. General part, (Drept penal. Partea generală), Bucharest, Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House, 1971.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-23

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.