ROLE OF THE INTERPRETATION RESERVE IN THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF ROMANIAN AND FRENCH CRIMINAL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v8i4.1604Abstract
The interpretation reserve is the only instrument through which the criminal judge becomes an actor in the constitutionalization process of the criminal law, because although he does not rejoice from the competence of rendering decisions the on constitutionality or unconstitutionality of law, the interpretation under reserve directly refers to it, by the compulsoriness of observing the sense granted by the constitutional court.Â
References
ï€ E. Cartier (dir.), La QPC, le procès et ses juges. L'impact sur le procès et l'architecture juridictionnelle, ed. Dalloz, Paris, 2013;
ï€ P. Gaïa, Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel, 17e édition, ed. Dalloz, Paris, 2013;
ï€ Bianca Selejan-GuÈ›an, Exception of unconstitutionality, ed. 2, ed. C. H. Beck, Bucharest, 2010;
ï€ G. Royer, “La réserve d'interprétation constitutionnelle en droit criminel†in Revue de sciences criminelles, no. 4/2008;
ï€ D. Rebut, „Le juge pénal face aux exigences constitutionnelles†in Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, no. 16 (Dossier: le Conseil Constitutionnel et les divers branches du droit), June 2004, article consulted on the website www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr, on November 13, 2013;
ï€ V. M. Ciobanu, „Considerations regarding the decisions that can be pronounced following the exercise of constitutionality control†in Dreptul, no. 5-6/1994.
