A 3C-TPB Model of Cryptocurrency Education Readiness: Evidence from Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2026.3.7488Keywords:
Computing-Communications-Control, Cryptocurrency, Education, Theory of Planned Behavior, PLS-SEMAbstract
Cryptocurrency systems integrate computing, communication, and control mechanisms; therefore, they create a need for structured education to support understanding and innovation. Public readiness for cryptocurrency education has been investigated across behavioral, technological, and regulatory dimensions. Previous studies have approached these dimensions in isolation, without a unified framework to explain their combined influence on readiness and behavioral intention. To address this gap, this paper examines the conditions that shape readiness for institutionalized cryptocurrency education and explores their effects on behavioral intention. The Theory of Planned Behavior was integrated with a Computing–Communications–Control structure to establish the proposed research model. Readiness is viewed as the product of computing-related capabilities, communication processes, and regulatory conditions. A survey was conducted with 476 adults in Romania. Based on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, the findings reveal that perceived behavioral control is positively influenced by education, financial literacy, and system familiarity. Behavioral intention is positively predicted by perceived behavioral control and regulatory clarity. Within the communication dimension, social media influence positively predicts subjective norms. However, subjective norms show a negative relationship with intention, pointing to a counterintuitive dynamic in how communication conditions operate in this context. This work introduces a system-level framework that connects capability formation, communication dynamics, and control conditions within a unified structure. It provides a foundation for designing cryptocurrency education programs that integrate technical competence, information evaluation, and regulatory awareness.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ahmad, M.; Kowalewski, O.; Pisany, P. (2023). What determines initial coin offering success: A cross-country study, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(5), 622–645.
Albayati, H.; Alistarbadi, N.; Rho, J. J. (2023). Assessing engagement decisions in NFT metaverse based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), Telematics and Informatics Reports, 10, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100045.
Antonopoulos, A. M. (2017). Mastering Bitcoin: Programming the open blockchain (2nd ed.), O’Reilly Media, ISBN: 978-1491954386.
Arpaci, I. (2020). The influence of social interactions and subjective norms on social media postings, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 19(3), 2050023.
Agu, E. E.; Abhulimen, A. O.; Obiki-Osafiele, A. N.; Osundare, O. S.; Adeniran, I. A.; Efunniyi, C. P. (2024). Proposing strategic models for integrating financial literacy into national public education systems, International Journal of Frontier Research in Science, 3(2), 010–019.
Atzei, N.; Bartoletti, M.;Cimoli, T. (2017). A survey of attacks on Ethereum smart contracts, Principles of Security and Trust, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10204, 164-186, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_8.
Blue, L. E.; Xing, C.; Pham, T. (2024). Cryptocurrency purchases among young adults: Behaviors and educational opportunities, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, Vol.35, Issue3, Springer, p.352-365, https://doi.org/10.1891/jfcp-2022-0084.
Alharbi, A.; Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology Readiness and Cryptocurrency Adoption: PLS-SEM and Deep Learning Neural Network Analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 21388–21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055785.
Alomari, A. S. A.; Abdullah, N. L. (2023). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Cryptocurrency among Saudi Arabian public university students: Moderating role of financial literacy. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2178092, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2178092.
Angeles, I. T. (2025). Behavioral Biases, Risk Tolerance, Knowledge, and Investment on Cryptocurrency: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 14(2), 687–704. Available at https://www.buscompress.com/uploads/3/ 4/9/8/34980536/riber_14-2_45_s24-35_687-704.pdf.
Badulescu, D.; Simut, R.; Bodog, S.-A.; Badulescu, A.; Simut, C.; Zapodeanu, D. (2025). Shaping AI-related competencies for labor market and business. A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 20(1), 6894. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2025.1.6894.
Bouma-Sims, E.; Hassan, H.; Nisenoff, A.; Cranor, L. F.; Christin, N. (2024). It was honestly just gambling: Investigating the experiences of teenage cryptocurrency users on Reddit, In Twentieth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. USENIX Association. ISBN: 978-1-939133-42-7.
Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform, https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper.
Cerulli, D.; Scott, M.; Aunap, R.; Kull, A.; Pärn, J.; Holbrook, J.; Mander, U. (2020). The role of education in increasing awareness and reducing impact of natural hazards, Sustainability, 12(18), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187623.
Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Sun, W. (2020). Bitcoin price prediction using machine learning: An approach to sample dimension engineering, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 365, 112395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112395.
Clark, T. N. (1968). Institutionalization of innovations in higher education: Four models, Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 1–25.
Conner, M.; Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.
Cristofaro, M.; Giardino, PL.; Misra, S.; Pham, Q.T.; Hiep Phan, H.(2023). Behavior or culture? Investigating the use of cryptocurrencies for electronic commerce across the USA and China, Management Research Review, Vol. 46 No. 3 pp. 340–368, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR- 06-2021-0493.
Cuc, L.D.; Rad, D.; Săplăcan, S.; Şendroiu, C.; Bâtcă-Dumitru, G.C.; Wysocki, D.; Duţu, A.;Manolescu, A.-A. (2024). A hierarchical clustering analysis of the management accounting practicesperceptions in Romania, International Journal of Computers Communications&Control, 19(6), 6864, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2024.6.6864
El Koshiry, A.; Eliwa, E.; Abd El-Hafeez T.; Shams; M. Y.(2023). Unlocking the power of blockchain in education: An overview of innovations and outcomes, Blockchain: Research and Applications, 4(4), 100165, 2023.
Elie-Dit-Cosaque,C.; Jessie, P.; Kalika, M. (2011). The influence of individual, contextual, and social factors on perceived behavioral control of information technology: A field theory approach, Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 201–234.
Eurojust-a, [Online].Support operation against cryptocurrency fraud in Romania and Republic of Moldova (2023). Eurojust. Available: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news /support -operationagainst- cryptocurrency-fraud-romania-and-republic-moldova, Accesed on 10.08.2024.
Eurojust-b, [Online].Actions across Europe against online fraud using cryptocurrencies (2024). Eurojust. Available: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news/actions-across-europe-against-onlinefraud- cryptocurrencies, Accesed on 10.08.2024.
Fakhrullah, F.; Xiao, D.; Suplata, M. et al. (2025). Customer-Centric Value Assessment of Cryptocurrency Adaptation, Comput Econ 66, 4923–4958,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-10868-6.
FDCI (2023). Future of Digital Currency Initiative, Stanford University, https://fdc.stanford.edu, Accessed on 20.07.2025.
Financial Action Task Force (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and virtual asset service providers, FATF, https://www.fatfgafi. org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/guidance-rba-virtual-assets-2021.html, Accessed on 25.02.2026.
Guo, Y.; Yousef, E.; Naseer, M. M. (2025). Examining the Drivers and Economic and Social Impacts of Cryptocurrency Adoption, FinTech, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech4010005.
Gupta, S.; Dhingra, S.; Aggarwal, R. (2023). What explains the sudden surge in cryptocurrency? A consumption value theory perspective, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(6), 634–652.
Hall, B. H.; Khan, B. (2023). Adoption of new technology, NBER Working Paper, (No. w9730). https://doi.org/10.3386/w9730.
Hallak, I. (2023). Markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) (PE 739.221), European Parliamentary Research Service, [online] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/739221/EPRS_BRI%282022%297 39221_EN.pdf, Accesed on 14 March 2026.
Hasan, S. Z.; Ayub, H.; Ellahi, A.; Saleem, M. (2022). A moderated mediation model of factors influencing intention to adopt cryptocurrency among university students, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022(1), 9718920. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9718920.
Hayashi, F.; Routh, A. (2024). Financial Literacy, Risk Tolerance, and Cryptocurrency Ownership in the United States, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Paper RWP 24-03. https://doi.org/10.18651/RWP2024-03.
Hegerty, S.; Weresa, M. (2024). Mapping research on digital innovation in the health sector: A bibliometric approach, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 0(0), 1–18.
Honak, I.; Kostetskyi, Y. (2022). The need for citizens to receive higher education and study the fundamentals of cryptocurrency business in institutions of higher education in Ukraine, Economic Discourse, 1(1–2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2022-1-2.
Houben, R.; Snyers, A. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain: Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion, European Parliament, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, Retrived in 8 August 2025 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/150761/TAX3%20Study%20on%20cryptocurren cies%20and%20blockchain.pdf.
Johnson, K.; Krueger, B. (2021) Who Supports Using Cryptocurrencies and Why Public Education About Blockchain Technology Matters?, Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Christopher G. Reddick & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar & Hans Jochen Scholl (ed.), Blockchain and the Public Sector, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 127-149, Springer, 36, 2021, https://10.1007/978-3-030-55746-1_6.
Kumari, V.; Bala, P. K.; Chakraborty, S. (2023). An empirical study of user adoption of cryptocurrency using blockchain technology: Analysing role of success factors like technology awareness and financial literacy, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 1580-1600.
Kum-Lung, C.; Teck-Chai, L. (2010). Attitude towards business ethics: Examining the influence of religiosity, gender, and education levels, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(1), 225.
Le, HH.; Nguyen, B.T.; Thien, N.N. (2024). Herding behavior in the cryptocurrency market: the case of the Russia–Ukraine conflict, J. Ind. Bus. Econ. 51, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00279-9.
Mahendrata, B.; Auliansyah, S.; Pratama, E.A.; Arifin, D.Z.; Fachmi, M. (2025). Social Media Influencers and Bitcoin Literacy as Determinants of Investment Intention: The Mediating Role of FoMO, International Conference on Digital Business Innovation and Technology Management (ICONBIT), 1(2). Retrieved from https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/iconbit/article/view/4929.
Ministerul Educat, iei s, i Cercetării (2024). [Online] Strategia Nat,ională de Educat,ie Financiară 2024-2030 a fost adoptată, https://www.edu.ro/comunicat_presa_33_2024_adoptare_SNEF, Accessed on 16.04.2026.
MICA, European Parliament (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA), [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023R1114, Accessed on 25.01.2026.
MIT (2023). [Online] MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Available: https://dci.mit.edu/about1, Accessed on 10.02.2026.
Mosina, J.; Ševčenko, G. (2024). A systematic literature review on perception, adoption, and investment decision-making in cryptocurrency markets: Unveiling global trends and gaps, China Accounting and Finance Review, https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-05-2023-0053.
MSC (2023). [Online] MSc in Blockchain and Digital Currency, University of Nicosia. Retrieved March 4, 2023, from https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/mscdigitalcurrency, Accessed on 25.01.2026.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). [Online] Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, https://bitcoin.o rg/bitcoin.pdf, Accessed on 13.12.2025.
Nessel, K.; Kościółek, S.; Leśniak, A. (2024). Role of subjective norms in shaping entrepreneurial intentions among students Economics and Business Review, 10(4).
Nguyen, L.; Nguyen, P. (2024). The interplay between governance mechanisms of blockchain platforms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 0(0), 1–25.
[Online]. Blockchain and cryptocurrency laws and regulations: Romania (2023). Available: https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/blockchain-cryptocurrency-laws-andregulations/ romania, Accesed on 10.08.2025.
Patan, R.; Parizi, R. M.; Dorodchi, M.; Pouriyeh, S.; Rorrer, A. (2023). Blockchain education: Current state, limitations, career scope, challenges, and future directions, arXiv Preprint arXiv:2301.07889. Retrieved August 28, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367281434.
Pouratashi, M. (2021). The influence of formal and informal education on students’ sustainable development skills: A study in Iran, Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 24(2), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2021-0009.
Ringle, C. M.; Wende, S.; Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4, Bönningstedt: SmartPLS.
Rodpangtiam, A. (2022). The influence of perceived risk and perceived value on consumer adoption of cryptocurrency, Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD). https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.IS.2022.49.
Romanian Police (2024). [Online] Romanian police issue warnings about cryptocurrency scams, https://politiaromana.ro/ro/stiri-si-media/stiri/inselaciunile-prin-metoda-trading-scamin- contextul-sarbatorilor-de-iarna, Accessed on 2810.2025.
Sabau-Popa, C.D.; Rus, L.; Florea, A.; Ban, O.I.; Dzitac, S.; Marcu, O.A. (2024). Were the manufacturing companies resilient in the face of Covid-19 or did they take advantage? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(5), 1372–1391. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20806.
Shao, C.; Ciampaglia, G. L.; Varol, O.; Yang, K.-C.; Flammini, A.; Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots, Nature Communications, 9(4787), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
Singh, G.; Rani, S. (2025). Awareness and Perception of Cryptocurrency Among College Students: A Study on Knowledge, Adoption and Attitude, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT). Available at https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2503644.pdf.
Steinmetz, F.; von Meduna, M.; Ante, L.; Fiedler, I. (2021). Ownership, uses, and perceptions of cryptocurrency: Results from a population survey, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121073.
Stoian, C.; Bucerzan, D.; Bejan, C. (2023). Blockchain technology and smart contracts - Public policy needed in the technology race, In Recent Debates in Cyberspace and Artificial Intelligence Law, Contributions to the 3rd International Conference on FinTech, Cyberspace and Artificial Intelligence Law, (pp. 166–183), ISBN: 978-606-95351-7-2.
Toader, D.; Toader, C.; Boca, G.; Toader, R.; Rădulescu, A. (2023). The adoption of blockchain technology in higher education: The impact of leadership readiness, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(Special Issue), 133-155.
Trivedi, S. K.; Patra, P.; Srivastava, P. R.; Kumar, A.; Ye, F. (2024). Exploring factors affecting users’ behavioral intention to adopt digital technologies: The mediating effect of social influence, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, V.71, p.13814–13826.
Vasek, M.;Moore, T. (2015). There’s no free lunch, even using Bitcoin: Tracking the popularity and profits of virtual currency scams, International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 44–61, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47854-7_4.
Vosoughi, S.; Roy, D.; Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online, Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Dai, J.; Gu, X.; Yu, T. (2024). Factors influencing university students’ behavioral intention to use generative artificial intelligence: Integrating the theory of planned behavior and AI literacy, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033.
Wang, J.; Deng, L. (2026). Influencing factors and mechanisms of action on the participation intentions of cryptocurrency investment fraud victims-A quantitative examination from the perspective of the theory of planned behavior, PLoS One 21(2): e0339989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339989.
Wong, L. H.; Hurbean, L.; Davison, R. M.; Ou, C. X.; Muntean, M. (2022). Working around inadequate information systems in the workplace: An empirical study in Romania, International Journal of Information Management, 64, 102471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102471.
You, X.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y. (2023). Interplay between Information and Behavior Based on Small Group Effect on Multilayer Social Networks. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 18(5), 5074. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2023.5.5074.
Zetzsche, D. A.; Buckley, R. P.; Arner, D. W.; Fohr, L. (2017). The ICO gold rush: It’s a scam, it’s a bubble, it’s a super challenge for regulators, University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper, 11/2017, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072298.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dominic Bucerzan, Mihaela Muntean, Crina Anina Bejan, El Mahdi Mouloua, Mustapha Najmeddine, Camelia Nadia Bran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ONLINE OPEN ACCES: Acces to full text of each article and each issue are allowed for free in respect of Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.
You are free to:
-Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
-Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
DISCLAIMER: The author(s) of each article appearing in International Journal of Computers Communications & Control is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; the publication of an article shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute any representation by the Editors or Agora University Press that the data presented therein are original, correct or sufficient to support the conclusions reached or that the experiment design or methodology is adequate.
