Interpretable Deep Learning using Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks for Energy Theft Detection

Authors

  • Bogdan Constantin Neagu Gheoghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Romania
  • Adi Aurelian Gugiuman Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași, Romania
  • Gheorghe Grigoras Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași, Romania
  • Attila Simo Politehnica University Timişoara, Romania
  • Simona Dzitac University of Oradea, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2026.1.7409

Keywords:

Interpretable Deep Learning, Energy Theft Detection, Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks

Abstract

The increasing availability of high-resolution metering data has positioned deep learning as a powerful tool for energy theft detection; however, most existing approaches rely on black-box models that lack interpretability and require large, labeled datasets, limiting their applicability in regulated and safety-critical environments. This paper proposes an interpretable deep learn-ing approach for energy theft detection based on Kolmogorov–Arnold Net-works (KAN), explicitly designed to combine non-linear modeling capability with feature-level transparency. The novelty of the proposed method lies in embedding explainability directly into the learning architecture, rather than relying on post hoc explanation techniques. By representing the detection function as a composition of learnable univariate spline functions, the KAN-based model enables direct visualization and quantitative interpretation of each input feature’s contribution to the detection outcome. This property al-lows energy theft detection to be formulated as a transparent decision-support process, suitable for operational deployment and regulatory auditing. The proposed approach integrates engineered consumption features with KAN-based inference and supports deployment within a distributed edge in-telligence architecture, enabling low-latency detection and privacy-aware processing. Experimental evaluation on representative low-voltage network data demonstrates that the proposed approach achieves competitive detection accuracy while significantly improving interpretability and robustness under prosumer-induced variability. The results confirm that inherently interpreta-ble deep learning models represent a viable and effective alternative to con-ventional black-box techniques for energy theft detection.

References

Depuru, S.S.S.R.; Wang, L.; Devabhaktuni, V. (2011). Electricity theft: Overview, issues, prevention and a smart-meter based approach to control theft, Energy Policy, 39(2), 1007-1015, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.037

Glauner, P.; Meira, J.A.; Valtchev, P.; State, R.; Bettinger, F. (2017). The challenge of nontechnical loss detection using artificial intelligence: A survey, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 10(1), 760-775, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.51

Chuwa, M.G.; Bamisaye, O.; Asuha, M. (2021). A review of non-technical loss attack models and detection methods in smart grid, Electric Power Systems Research, 197, 107270, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107415

Nizar, A.; Dong, Z.Y.; Wang, Y. (2019). Power-utility non-technical loss analysis with extreme learning machine method, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23(3), 946-955, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926431

Haq, E.U.; Iqbal, M.S.; Akhtar, Z. (2023). Electricity-theft detection for smart grid security using smart-meter data, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 34, 101117, 2023.

Stracqualursi, E.; Rinaldi, L.; Spina, A. (2023). Systematic review of energy-theft practices and detection methodologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113340, 2023.

European Commission (2022). Digitalising the Energy System - EU Action Plan, COM(2022) 552 final, 2022.

ACER/CEER (2023). Annual Market Monitoring Report, Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, 2023.

Gu, D.; Gao, Y.; Chen, K.; Shi, J.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y. (2022). Electricity theft detection in AMI with low false positive rate based on deep learning and evolutionary algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(6), 4568-4578, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3150050

Cai, Q.; Li, P.; Wang, R. (2023). Electricity theft detection based on hybrid random forest and weighted support vector data description, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 153, 109283, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109283

Taha, A.; El-Ghany, H.; Riad, K. (2021). A robust ensemble-based model for electricity theft detection in AMI systems, IEEE Access, 9, 35012-35025, 2021.

Gupta, A.; Banerjee, S.; Pal, S. (2021). Support vector machine-based anomaly detection in residential smart meters, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 132, 107166, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107166

Singh, S.K.; Bose, R.; Joshi, A. (2019). Energy theft detection for AMI using principal component analysis based reconstructed data, IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 4(2), 179-185, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5050

Lin, G.; et al. (2021). Electricity theft detection in power consumption data based on adaptive tuning recurrent neural network, Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.773805

Saqib, S.M.; et al. (2024). Deep learning-based electricity theft prediction in non-smart grid environments, Heliyon, 10(15), 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35167

Ishkov, D.O.; Terekhov, V.I.; Myshenkov, K.S. (2023). Energy theft detection in smart grids via explainable attention maps, In Proceedings of the 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE), IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086919

Adadi, A.; Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the Black-Box: A survey on Explainable AI (XAI), IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052

Carvalho, D.V.; Pereira, E.M.; Cardoso, J.S. (2019). Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics, Electronics, 8(8), 832, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8080832

Ribeiro, M.T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier, In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135-1144, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

Muşat, B.; Andonie, R. (2022). Information Bottleneck in Deep Learning - A Semiotic Approach, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 17(1), Article 4650, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2022.1.4650

Liu, Z.; Ma, P.; Wang, Y.; Matusik, W.; Tegmark, M. (2024). KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19756, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/4t7t-v19l

Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X. (2025). Predicting Multi-Indicator Stock Time Series using Convolutional Neural Networks based on Feature Engineering, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 20(5), 2025. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2025.5.6774

Gugiuman, A.A.; Neagu, B.C.; Grigoras, G. (2025). Explainable Detection of Non-Technical Losses in Smart Grids Using a Deterministic Profiling Framework, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Future Energy Solutions (FES), pp. 1-4, in press.

Bitir-Istrate, I.; Doroftei, L.-A.; Militaru, G. (2024). Solutions to improve the energy efficiency of non-residential buildings: Evidence from Romania, Journal of Research and Innovation for Sustainable Society, 6(2), 388-398, 2024. DOI: 10.33727/JRISS.2024.2.41:388-398. https://doi.org/10.33727/JRISS.2024.2.41:388-398

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-21

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.