Digital Perception Functionality for Institutional Design: The Forest Policy Issue of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" of Scotland as a Case Study
Keywords:
Forest-environmental Policy, Cross-sectorality, Forestry & Rural Development, Network Analysis Software.Abstract
Motivation for this research was the need to perceive the relations among actors involved in the rural-forest policy networks. The problem of an objective analysis of formal and informal power and information flow structure measurement and visualization in policy-making is tried to be solved. The policy network of "Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park" is used as a case study as it includes a great variety of actors. An answer to the much-discussed problem of digital perception of politico-administrative power are in part the results about: (1) how complexity of policy making can be measured and what this practically means, (2) who controls the communication, (3) where the most important information resources are located, and (4) who is most trustworthy in this network. It is concluded that: "Important" information is not a source of trust, but rather inversely, through trust one can impose information as being important. Between actors of relatively high trust status, the most trusted one does not need to control information in order to strengthen its position. A less trusted actor may supplement the lack of power status with information control. The leading role that forestry sector may play even in cross-sectoral issues is pointed out in this case study.References
M. Baur, M. Benkert, U. Brandes, S. Cornelsen, M. Gaertler, B. Koepf, J. Lerner and D. Wagner, Visone - Software for Visual Social Network Analysis, Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Graph Drawing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2265, 463-464, Springer, 2002.
U. Brandes, P. Kenis, D. Wagner Communicating centrality in policy network drawings, IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 9(2), 241- 253, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2003.1196010
P. Cisar, S. Bosnjak and S. Maravic Cisar, EWMA Algorithm in Network Practice. Int J Comput Commun, 5(2): 160-170, 2010.
A. Degenne and M. Forse, Introducing Social Networks, Sage, Great Britain, 1999.
N.D. Hasanagas, A.D. Styliadis, E.I. Papadopoulou and P.K. Birtsas. Land Policy & Socio- Spatial Impacts in a burned forest: The case of Chalkidiki, Greece (2006), RevCAD - Journal of Geodesy and Cadastre, 99-112, 2010.
E. Papadopoulou, N.D. Hasanagas and D. Harvey. Analysis of Rural Development Policy Networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4): 663-673, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.005
U. Dolata, Flaws in network - competition and cooperation in the technical development and regulation (orig. German), Politische Verteljahresschrift 41, Sonderheft 31, 2000.
S.N. Eisenstadt, Power, Trust, and Meaning. Essays in sociological Theory and Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1995.
J. Engler and A. Kusiak, Mining Authoritativeness of Collaborative Innovation Partners, Int J Comput Commun, 5(1): 42-51, 2010.
W.J. Frawley, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro G. and C.J. Matheus, Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview, AAAI Press, 1992.
D. Hand, H. Mannila and P. Smyth, Principles of Data Mining. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
N.D. Hasanagas and R. Shoesmith, The role of the European Parliament in forest environment issues, European Environment, 12, 213-223, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.296
N.D. Hasanagas, A.D. Styliadis, E. Papadopoulou and L. Sexidis, E- Learning & Environmental Policy: The case of a politico-administrative GIS, Int J Comput Commun, 5(5): 517-524, 2010.
N.D. Hasanagas. Network Analysis Functionality in Environmental Policy: Combining abstract software engineering with field empiricism, Int J Comput Commun, 6(4): 622-635, 2011.
Ch. Henning and A. Wald, On the theory of interest intermediation: A network approach illustrated with the case of the Common European Agricultural Policy (orig. German), Politische Vierteljahreschrift, 41., Heft 4, 647-676, 2000.
N.D. Hasanagas, A.D. Styliadis and E. Papadopoulou, Environmental Policy & Science Management: Using a scientometric-specific GIS for e-learning purposes, Int J Comput Commun, 5(2): 171-178, 2010.
L. Katz, A new Status index derived from sociometric analysis, Psychometrika, V.18, 1, March, 1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289026
D. Knoke and J.H. Kuklinski, Network Analysis. Quantitative applications in the Social Sciences, Sage, California, 1982.
H.S. Ko and S.Y. Nof S.Y. Design Protocols for Task Administration in Collaborative Production Systems, Int J Comput Commun, 5(1): 91-105, 2010.
M. Krott, Public administration in environemntal protection. Results of a service-oriented policy-analysis using the example of the forest protection as an illustration (orig. German), Wilhelm Braumueller Verlag. Wien, 1990.
M. Krott, Self-regulation in forest policy as a challenge to forestry science and practice (orig. German). Forstw. Cbl. 115, 97-107, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738589
M. Krott and N.D. Hasanagas, Measuring bridges between sectors: Causative evaluation of cross-sectorality, Forest Policy and Economics, 8: 555-563, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.004
S. Alexiadis, Ch. Ladias and N. Hasanagas. Examining Agriculture from a Regional Perspective: Implications for the Common Agricultural Policy, Land Use Policy, 30 (1): 665-669, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.013
Published
Issue
Section
License
ONLINE OPEN ACCES: Acces to full text of each article and each issue are allowed for free in respect of Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.
You are free to:
-Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
-Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
DISCLAIMER: The author(s) of each article appearing in International Journal of Computers Communications & Control is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; the publication of an article shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute any representation by the Editors or Agora University Press that the data presented therein are original, correct or sufficient to support the conclusions reached or that the experiment design or methodology is adequate.
