Balancing Between Exploration and Exploitation in ACO

Authors

  • Alina Eugenia Negulescu University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest Romania, 060042 Bucharest, sector 6, Splaiul Independentei, 313
  • Sorin Constantin Negulescu Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Romania, 550024 Sibiu, Victoriei Bvd., 10
  • Ioan Dzitac 1. Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad Romania, 310330 Arad, Elena Dragoi, 2 ioan.dzitac@uav.ro 2. Agora University of Oradea Romania, 410526 Oradea, Piata Tineretului, 8

Keywords:

ACO, TSP, B, Elitist Ant System (EAS), Beta-Elitist Ant System (BEAS), transition rule

Abstract

In order to balance the preference of the artificial entities towards exploration or exploitation (in their transition rule), a novel technique is proposed for replacing the random function used by the classical Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithms for solving the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). The proposed Beta Distribution function (B), or random:betavariate(a; b) has the proven capability (depicted through test-runs) of influencing the algorithm’s solution quality and convergence speed. Consequently, this paper will introduce in the related work section the classical ACO algorithm, with a focus on the transition rule used for choosing the next node in the problem’s associated graph, followed by the related work on this topic, and it will continue with the introduction of the B function which will be presented both from a theoretical and practical perspective in relation with the scope: balancing between exploration and exploitation in order to improve the performance of the ACO algorithm for the TSP. The paper concludes that the B-EAS has the ability to find better solution than EAS for a set of benchmarks from the TSPLib library.

References

Afshar, M.H. (2005); A new transition rule for ant colony optimization algorithms: application to pipe network optimization problems, Engineering Optimization, 37 (5): 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150500100312

Blum, C.; Roli, A.; Dorigo, M. (2001); HC-ACO: The Hyper-Cube Framework for Ant Colony Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 399- 403.

Bullnheimer, B.; Hartl, R.F.; Strauss, C. (1999); A New Rank Based Version of the Ant System: A Computational Study, Central European Journal for Operations Research and Economics, 25-38.

Cordón, O.; de Viana, I.F.; Herrera, F.; Moreno, L. (2000); A new ACO model integrating evolutionary computation concepts: The best-worst Ant System. In M. Dorigo, M. Middendorf, & T. Stuützle (Eds.), Abstract Proceedings of ANTS 2000-From Ant Colonies to Artificial Ants: Second International Workshop on Ant Algorithms, Brussels, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 22-29.

Dorigo, M.; Maniezo, V.; Colorni, A. (1996); Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part B, 26 (1): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436

Dorigo, M.; Gambardella, L. (1997); Ant Colony System: A Cooperative Learning. IEEE Transactions of Evolutionary Computation, 1 (1): 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585892

Google (2016). Google Trends, Retrieved from https://www.google.com/trends/explore? q=AntColonyOptimization.

Goss, S.; Aron, S.; Deneubourg, J.L.; Pasteels, J.M. (1989); Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant, Naturwissenschaften, 76, 579-581, Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462870

Gutjahr, W.J. (2000). A Graph-based Ant System and its convergence, Future Generation Computer Systems, 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00044-3

Kerns, G. (2011); Introduction to Probability and Statistics Using R, IPSUR, ISBN: 978-0- 557-24979-4.

Negulescu, S.; Dzitac, I.; Lascu, A. (2010); Synthetic Genes for Artificial Ants. Diversity in Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms, International Journal of Computers Communication & Control, 5 (2): 216-223. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2010.2.2476

Reinelt, G. (1991); TSPLIB - A Traveling Salesman Problem Library. ORSA Journal on Computing, 376-384. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.3.4.376

Susnea, I.; Axenie, C. (2015); Cognitive maps for indirect coordination of intelligent agents, Studies in Informatics and Control, 24(1): 111-118.

Tuba, M.; Jovanovic, R.(2013); Improved ACO Algorithm with Pheromone Correction Strategy for the Traveling Salesman Problem, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 8(3): 477-485. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2013.3.7

Wei, X.; Han, L.; Hong, L. (2014); A modified ant colony algorithm for traveling salesman problem, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 9(5): 633-643. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2014.5.1280

Published

2017-02-28

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.