A Improved EPC Class 1 Gen 2 Protocol with FCFS Feature in the Mobile RFID Systems

  • Xiaowu Li Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China NO.111 of the North Second Ring Road
  • Quanyuan Feng School of Information Science and Technology Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China NO.111 of the North Second Ring Road


In all anti-collision protocols of RFID standards, EPCGlobal Class 1 Generation 2 (C1G2) protocol has been most widely used in RFID systems since it is simply, efficient and safety. Similar to most existing anti-collision protocols, The C1G2 protocol initially aims at tag identification of static scenarios, where all tags keep still during the tag identification process. However, in many real scenarios, tags generally move along a fixed path in the reader coverage area, which implies that tags stay the coverage area only for a limited time (sojourn time). The scenarios are usually called mobile RFID systems. Because the multiple tag identification based on a shared wireless channel is random, tags entering the reader coverage area earlier may be identified later (random later identification phenomenon). The phenomenon and the limited sojourn time may let some tags lost. In this paper, we propose an improved C1G2 protocol with first come first served feature in mobile RFID systems. The protocol can overcome the RLI phenomenon effectively and retains good initial qualities of C1G2 protocol by modifying it slightly. Simulation results show that the proposed protocol can significantly reduce the numbers of lost tags in mobile RFID systems. The idea of the paper is beneficial for redesigning other existing tag anti-collision protocols so as to make these protocols adapt to mobile RFID systems.


[1] He, M. et al (2011); A fast RFID Tag Identification Algorithm Based on Counter and Stack, Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN 0957-4174, 38: 6829-6838.

[2] Yeh, M. et al. (2009); Adaptive Splitting and Pre-signaling for RFID Tag Anti-collision, Computer Communications, ISSN 0140-3664, 32: 1862-1870.

[3] Finkenzeller, K. (2002); RFID Handbook: Radio-frequency Identification Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley Press.

[4] Chen, Y. (2013); Multiple-Bits-Slot Reservation Aloha Protocol for Tag Identification, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, ISSN 0098-3063, 59(1): 93-10.

[5] Alcaraz, J. et al. (2013); A Stochastic Shortest Path Model to Minimize the Reading Time in DFSA-Based RFID Systems, IEEE Communications Letters, ISSN 1089-7798, 17(2): 341- 344.

[6] Wong, C. et al. (2007); Grouping Based Bit-slot ALOHA Protocol for Tag Anti-collision in RFID Systems, IEEE Communication Letters, ISSN 1089-7798, 11(12): 946-948.

[7] Jia, X. et al. (2010); An Efficient Anti-collision Protocol for RFID Tag Identification, IEEE Communication Letters, ISSN 1089-7798, 14(11): 1014-1016.

[8] Zhu, L.; Yum, T. (2011); A Critical Survey and Analysis of RFID Anti-Collision Mechanisms, IEEE Communications Magazine, ISSN 0163-6804, 5: 214-221.

[9] Klair, D. et al. (2009); A Survey and Tutorial of RFID Anti-Collision Protocols, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, ISSN 1553-877X, 12(3): 400-421.

[10] EPCglobal Specification for RFID Air Interface; Radio-frequency identity protocols class-1 generation-2 UHF RFID protocol for communications at 860 MHz - 960 MHz, version 1.0.9, 2005.

[11] Vogt, H. (2002); Efficient Object Identification with Passive RFID Tag, Proceedings of 2002 IEEE international conference on systems, pp. 98-113

[12] Alcaraz, J. et al (2011); Dynamic System Model for Optimal onfiguration of Mobile RFID Systems, Computer Networks, ISSN 1389-1286, 55: 74-83.

[13] Vales-Alonso, J. et al (2009); Markovian model for Computation of Tag Loss Ratio in Dynamic RFID Systems, Proceedings of 5th European Workshop on RFID Systems and Technologies, Bremen, Germany, pp. 16-17.

[14] Vales-Alonso, J. et al (2011); On the Optimal Identification of Tag Sets in Time-constrained RFID Configurations, Sensors, ISSN 1424-8220, 11: 2946-2960.

[15] Xie, L. (2010); Efficient Tag Identification in Mobile RFID Systems., Proceedings of IEEE International Conference INFOCOM, pp. 15-19.

[16] Sarangan, V. (2008); A framework for fast RFID tag reading in static and mobile environments, Computer Networks, ISSN 1389-1286, 52(5): 1058-1073.

[17] Li, X.; Feng, Q. (2013); Grouping Based Dynamic Framed Slotted ALOHA for Tag Anti- Collision Protocol in the Mobile RFID Systems, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., ISSN 1935-0090, (2L): 655-659.
How to Cite
LI, Xiaowu; FENG, Quanyuan. A Improved EPC Class 1 Gen 2 Protocol with FCFS Feature in the Mobile RFID Systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 6, p. 854-862, nov. 2013. ISSN 1841-9844. Available at: <http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/761>. Date accessed: 04 july 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2013.6.761.


RFID, tag anti-collision, mobile RFID systems, EPC C1G2