A Multi-criteria Decision-making Model for Evaluating Suppliers in Green SCM

Wen Jiang, Chan Huang


In order to develop recycle economy and friendly saving environment, many business enterprises have deployed green supply chain management (GSCM) practices. By employing related theorise of GSCM, organizations expect to minimize the environment impact caused by their commercial and industrial activities in supply chain. Different suppliers may provide different GSCM practices, so evaluating their GSCM performance to rank the green suppliers is an important aspect in practice. In this paper, a novel decision method named fuzzy generalized regret decision-making method is proposed. The fuzzy generalized regret decision-making method is based on ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator, which is used to effectively aggregate individual regrets related to all stats of nature for an alternative under fuzzy decision-making environment. By combing the proposed method with the application background of GSCM practices, a novel fuzzy decision model for evaluating GSCM performance is further proposed. In the proposed model, the regret of decision maker is taken into consideration with an aim of minimizing the dissatisfaction when choosing the best green supplier. Individual regrets related to all criteria for a green supplier are aggregated to obtain effective regret. Finally, the green suppliers can be ranked according to the effective regrets. A numerical example is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.


generalized regret decision making; green supply chain; multi-criteria decision making; fuzzy set theory

Full Text:



Andiç E., Yurt Ö., and Baltacıoglu Baltacıoglu T.(2012); Green supply chains: Efforts and potential applications for the turkish market, Resources Conservation & Recycling, 58, 50-68, 2012.

Azevedo S. G., Carvalho H., and Machado V.C. (2011); The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach, Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, 47(6), 850-871, 2011.

Beamon B. M. (1998); Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods, International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3), 281–294, 1998.

Bell D. E. (1980); Regret in decision making under uncertainty, 30, Informs, 1982.

Büyüközkan G. and Çifçi G. (2011); A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information, Computers in Industry, 62(2), 164-174, 2011.

Chan H. K., He H., and Wang W. Y. C. (2012); Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 557-562, 2012.

Chien M. K. and Shih L. H. (2007); An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances, International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 4(3), 383–394, 2007.

Chao X., Peng Y., and Kou G. (2016); A similarity measure-based optimization model for group decision making with multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 12(1), 26-40, 2016.

Dou Y., Zhu Q., and Sarkis J. (2014); Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology, European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 420-431, 2014.

Deng X., Xiao F., and Deng Y. (2017); An improved distance-based total uncertainty measure in belief function theory, Applied Intelligence, 46(4), 898-915, 2017.

Deng X. and Jiang W. (2018); Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using an evidential network approach extended by belief rules and uncertainty measures, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 117, 183-193, 2018.

Deng X. (2018); Analyzing the monotonicity of belief interval based uncertainty measures in belief function theory, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Published online, doi: 10.1002/int.21999, 2018.

Deng X., Han D., Dezert J., Deng Y., and Yu S. (2016); Evidence combination from an evolutionary game theory perspective, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46(9), 2070-2082, 2016.

Deng X. and Jiang W. (2018); An evidential axiomatic design approach for decision making using the evaluation of belief structure satisfaction to uncertain target values, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(1), 15-32, 2018.

Deza M. M. and Deza E. (2009); Encyclopedia of distances, Encyclopedia of Distances, 24, 1-583, Springer, 2009.

Dzitac I. (2015); The fuzzification of classical structures: A general view, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 10(6), 772-778, 2015.

Eltayeb T. K.,Zailani S., and Ramayah T. (2011); Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes, Resources Conservation & Recycling, 55(5), 495-506, 2011.

ElSayed A., Kongar E., and Gupta S. M. (2015); Fuzzy linear physical programming for multiple criteria decision-making under uncertainty, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11(1), 26-38, 2015.

Filiz-Ozbay E. and Ozbay E. Y. (2007); Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment, American Economic Review, 97(4), 1407–1418, 2007.

Govindan K., Kadzinski M., and Sivakumar R. (2017); Application of a novel prometheebased method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain, Omega, 71, 129-145, 2017.

Ghorabaee M.K, Amiri M., and Zavadskas E. K., Antucheviciene and J. (2017); Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of madm approaches, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 1073-1118, 2017.

Ghorabaee M. K., Zavadskas E. K., Amiri M., and Turskis Z. (2016); Extended edas method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control,11(3), 358-371, 2016.

Gencer C. and Gürpinar D. (2007); Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(11), 2475-2486, 2007.

GrecoS., Kadzinski M., Mousseau V., and Słowinski R. (2012); Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: Uta-group and utadis-group, Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 549-561, 2012.

Handfield R., WaltonS. V., Sroufe R., and Melnyk S. A. (2002); Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87, 2002.

Humphreys P. K., Wong Y. K., and Chan F. T. S. (2003); Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1), 349– 356, 2003.

He Z. and Jiang W. (2018); An evidential dynamical model to predict the interference effect of categorization on decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems, p. Published on line. Doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.014, 2018.

HervaniA. A., Helms M. M., and Sarkis J. (2005); Performance measurement for green supply chain management, Benchmarking, 12(4), 330–353, 2005.

Hsieh C. H. and Chen S. H. (1999); Model and algorithm of fuzzy product positioning, Information Sciences, 121(1), 61–82, 1999.

Igarashi M., Boer L. D., and Fet A. M.(2013); What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19(4), 247–263, 2013.

Jabbour C. J. C. (2015); Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824–1833, 2015.

Jiang W. and Wei B. (2018); Intuitionistic fuzzy evidential power aggregation operator and its application in multiple criteria decision-making, International Journal of Systems Science, 49(3), 582–594, 2018.

Jiang W., Chang Y., and Wang S. (2017); A method to identify the incomplete framework of discernment in evidence theory, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, Article ID 7635972, 2017.

Jiang W. and Hu W. (2018); An improved soft likelihood function for Dempster-Shafer belief structures, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Published on line. Doi: 10.1002/int.219809, 2018.

Jiang W. and Wang S. (2017); An uncertainty measure for interval-valued evidences, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 12(5), 631–644, 2017.

Jiang W., Wei B., Liu X., Li X., and Zheng H. (2018); Intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operator based on entropy and its application in decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(1), 49–67, 2018.

Kannan D. and Jabbour C. J. C. (2014); Suppliers based on gscm practices: Using fuzzy topsis applied to a brazilian electronics company, European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447, 2014.

Kaplinski O., Peldschus F., and Tupenaite L. (2014); Development of mcdm methods–in honour of professor edmundas kazimieras zavadskas on the occasion of his 70th birthday, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 9(3), 305–312, 2014.

Kannan D., Khodaverdi R., Olfat L., Jafarian A., and Diabat A. (2013); Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47(9), 355–367, 2013.

Kusi-Sarpong S., Sarkis J., and Wang X. (2016); Assessing green supply chain practices in the ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation, International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 325–341, 2016.

Kaufmann A. (1987); Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : Theory and applications, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1(1), 141–143, 1987.

Loomes G. and Sugden R. (1982); Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal, 92(368), 805–824, 1982.

Liang W., He J., Wang S., Yang L., and Chen F. (2018) Improved cluster collaboration algorithm based on wolf pack behavior, Cluster Computing, Published online, doi: 10.1007/s10586–018–1891–y, 2018.

Liu W., Liu H. B., and Li L. L. (2017); A multiple attribute group decision making method based on 2-D uncertain linguistic weighted heronian mean aggregation operator, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 12(2), 254–264, 2017.

Mo H. and Deng Y. (2016); A new aggregating operator in linguistic decision making based on D numbers, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(6), 831–846, 2016.

Merigo J. M. and Casanovas M. (2010); The fuzzy generalized owa operator and its application in strategic decision making, Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 41(5), 359–370, 2010.

O'Hagan M. (1988) Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic, Signals, Systems and Computers, 1988. IEEE Conference Twenty- Second Asilomar, 2, 681–689, 1988.

Rajendran K., S., Sarkis J.,Murugesan and P. (2015); Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83, 2015.

Sari K. (2017); A novel multi-criteria decision framework for evalutaing green supply chain management practices, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 338–347, 2017.

Walton S. V., Handfield R. B., and Melnyk S. A. (1998); The green supply chain: Integrating suppliers into environmental management processes, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 34(1), 2–11, 1998.

Xiao F. (2017); An improved method for combining conflicting evidences based on the similarity measure and belief function entropy, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,Published online, DOI: 10.1007/s40815–017–0436–5, 2017.

Xiao F. (2016); An intelligent complex event processing with D numbers under fuzzy environment, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, p. Article ID: 3713518, 2016.

Xu S., Jiang W., Deng X., and Shou Y. (2018); A modified physarum-inspired model for the user equilibrium traffic assignment problem, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 55, 340–353, 2018.

Xu H. and Deng Y. (2018); Dependent evidence combination based on shearman coefficient and pearson coefficient, IEEE Access, 6, 11634–11640, 2018.

Yager R. R. (2017); Generalized regret based decision making, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65, 400–405, 2017.

Yager R. R. (1996); Quantifier guided aggregation using owa operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 49–73, 1996.

Yager R. R. (1998); On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking, IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190, 1988.

Zadeh L. A. (1965); Fuzzy sets, Information & Control, 8(3), 338–353, 1965.

Zhu Q., Sarkis J., and Lai K. H.(2012); Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 168–185, 2012.

Zhu Q., Sarkis J., and Lai K. H. (2008); Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation, International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273, 2008.

Zhou X., Hu Y., Deng Y., Chan F. T. S., and Ishizaka A. (2018); A DEMATEL-Based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP, Annals of Operations Research, Published online, doi: 10.1007/s10479–018–2769–3, 2018.

Zheng X. and Deng Y. (2018); Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on evidence credibility decay model and iowa operator, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 112, 673–684, 2018.

Zheng H., Deng Y., and Hu Y. (2017); Fuzzy evidential influence diagram and its evaluation algorithm, Knowledge-Based Systems, 131, 28–45, 2017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2018.3.3283

Copyright (c) 2018 Wen Jiang, Chan Huang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

IJCCC is an Open Access Journal : CC-BY-NC.

Articles published in IJCCC user license are protected by copyright.

Users can access, download, copy, translate the IJCCC articles for non-commercial purposes provided that users, but cannot redistribute, display or adapt:

  • Cite the article using an appropriate bibliographic citation: author(s), article title, journal, volume, issue, page numbers, year of publication, DOI, and the link to the definitive published version on IJCCC website;
  • Maintain the integrity of the IJCCC article;
  • Retain the copyright notices and links to these terms and conditions so it is clear to other users what can and what cannot be done with the  article;
  • Ensure that, for any content in the IJCCC article that is identified as belonging to a third party, any re-use complies with the copyright policies of that third party;
  • Any translations must prominently display the statement: "This is an unofficial translation of an article that appeared in IJCCC. Agora University  has not endorsed this translation."

This is a non commercial license where the use of published articles for commercial purposes is forbiden. 

Commercial purposes include: 

  • Copying or downloading IJCCC articles, or linking to such postings, for further redistribution, sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Copying, downloading or posting by a site or service that incorporates advertising with such content;
  • The inclusion or incorporation of article content in other works or services (other than normal quotations with an appropriate citation) that is then available for sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Use of IJCCC articles or article content (other than normal quotations with appropriate citation) by for-profit organizations for promotional purposes, whether for a fee or otherwise;
  • Use for the purposes of monetary reward by means of sale, resale, license, loan, transfer or other form of commercial exploitation;

    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[End of CC-BY-NC  License for Website User]

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL (IJCCC), With Emphasis on the Integration of Three Technologies (C & C & C),  ISSN 1841-9836.

IJCCC was founded in 2006,  at Agora University, by  Ioan DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief),  Florin Gheorghe FILIP (Editor-in-Chief), and  Misu-Jan MANOLESCU (Managing Editor).

Ethics: This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Ioan  DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief) at COPE European Seminar, Bruxelles, 2015:

IJCCC is covered/indexed/abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded (since vol.1(S),  2006); JCR2018: IF=1.585..

IJCCC is indexed in Scopus from 2008 (CiteScore2018 = 1.56):

Nomination by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award Romania 2015 (SNIP2014 = 1.029): Elsevier/ Scopus

IJCCC was nominated by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award - "Scopus Awards Romania 2015" (SNIP2014 = 1.029).

IJCCC is in Top 3 of 157 Romanian journals indexed by Scopus (in all fields) and No.1 in Computer Science field by Elsevier/ Scopus.


 Impact Factor in JCR2018 (Clarivate Analytics/SCI Expanded/ISI Web of Science): IF=1.585 (Q3). Scopus: CiteScore2018=1.56 (Q2);

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Editors-in-Chief: Ioan DZITAC & Florin Gheorghe FILIP.