Quality System for Production Software as Tool for Monitoring and Improving Organization KPIs

  • Vasile Claudiu Kifor Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blv., 550024, Sibiu, Romania
  • Nicolae Tudor Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blv., 550024, Sibiu, Romania

Abstract

In this paper we propose a solution as support for quality systems for production software. The motivation behind this study was to reduce that cost in the production area caused by gaps in the quality of the production software. Our proposal: QSPS (Quality System for Production Software) is offering support in the "vulnerable points" of these quality systems which usually generate nonconformities and have proved to be difficult or impossible to control. QSPS is a method in seven steps or modules that integrates also software tools, templates, checklists, evaluating tools elaborated complying to products, process and system quality standards. If other analyzed methods like: Scrum, XP, Fuzzy, Prompt, PTA, PRINCE2 or norms like: ISO 9001, ISO 9000-3, TickIT, CMM and CMMI, AQAP-110/AQAP-150, IEEE 730/983 are working in a reactive way, after the developing phase was finished, QSPS is an active system, helping the software developer from the beginning of the implementation phase to improve the developing methodology and to fulfill the quality requirements. QSPS model was applied in one of the largest European automotive company, the result being finalized in a practical approach of the QSPS, named QSMA − Quality System for Manufacturing Application. Using the QSMA (Quality System for the manufacturing application) for industrial projects and not only therefore, has led to accurate running of the production line from beginning of the SOP (Start of Production). Once this system was implemented and the production software applications were realized under the principles and rules of the QSMA, we defined strategically measurable KPIs (key performance indicators) out of the seven modules of the QSMA. This KPIs have the role to signal every time a production application has not the desired quality level and presents a high level of risk that could cause additional costs in the production. Based on the KPIs evolution, the weaknesses in the software applications can be identified in real time, so that the developer can react immediately, before occurrence of substantial damage.

References

[1] Kai-Yuan Cai, Bey-Bey Yin, Software execution processes as an evolving complex network, Information Science, 179(12): 1903-1928, April 2008.

[2] Georg Kühner et al., Employing industrial standards in software engineering for W7X, Fusion Engineering and Design, 84(7-11): 1130-1135, 2009.

[3] J.-W. Li, Modeling a quality assurance information system for product development projects with the UML approach, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(4): 370-386, June 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09511920600795472

[4] Tudor, N., Kifor C.V. and Oprean, C., Quality system for production software QSPS, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, ISSN 1583-7904, 135 - 140, 2009.

[5] Oprean, C., Kifor C. V., Suciu, O., Managementul integrat al calitatii, Ed. Univ. Lucian Blaga din Sibiu, 2005, ISBN 973-739-034-2.

[6] N. Tudor, D. Dumitrascu, The Benefits of Project Structuring in Sub-projects and Work Packages, http://imtuoradea.ro/auo.fmte/files-2008/MIE_files/TUDOR%20NICOLAE%202.pdf.

[7] N. Tudor, D. Dumitrascu, Advance Estimate Expenses for Project Execution Time, http://imtuoradea.ro/auo.fmte/files-2008/MIE_files/TUDOR%20NICOLAE%201.pdf.

[8] Kifor, C.V., Oprean, C., Ingineria calitatii. Imbunatatirea sase sigma (Quality Engineering. Six sigma improvement), Sibiu, Ed. Univ. Lucian Blaga, 2006.

[9] Ebert, C., 2007, The impacts of software product management, The Journal of Systems and Software, 80: 850-861, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.017

[10] Kneuper, R., Sollmann, F., 1995: Normen zum Qualitätsmanagement bei der Softwareentwicklung Informatik Spektrum, Band 18 (1995), S. 314-323.

[11] Kifor, C.V., Tudor, N., Oprean, C., A practical approach to a quality system for production software for managing technological changes, Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Quality Management in Higher Education, ISBN 978-960-99486-2-3, Greece, 2011.

[12] Kifor, C., V.,Oprean, C., Banciu, D.M.,Intelligent system for assisting decisions in advanced product and process planning and design, Studies in informatics and control, ISSN 1220 - 1766, 18(3): 247 - 254, 2009.

[13] Oprean, C., Kifor, C. V., Quality Management, Callidus Publishing House, Germany, ISBN 978 - 3 - 940677-50-1, 2008.

[14] Petrash, R., The definition of software quality; a practical approach, ISSRE, 1999.

[15] Pires, J.N., Semi-autonomous manufacturing systems: The role of the human-machine interface software and of the manufacturing tracking software, Mechatronics, 1191-1205, 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2005.06.008

[16] Pressman, Scott, Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, Sixth Int. ed., McGraw- Hill Education, 388, 2005.

[17] Kifor, C., V.,Oprean, C., Banciu, D.M., Intelligent system for assisting decisions in advanced product and process planning and design, Studies in informatics and control, ISSN 1220 - 1766, 18(3): 247 - 254, 2009.

[18] Tudor, N., Kifor C. V., Oprean, C., Quality system for Production Software, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, ISSN 1583-7904, 135-140, 2009.

[19] Tudor, N., Kifor C.V., Oprean, C., Using QSPS in developing and realization of a production line in automotive industry, Int J Comput Commun, ISSN 1841-9836, 5(5): 945-952, 2010.

[20] McBride, T., The mechanisms of project management of software development, The Journal of Systems and Software, ISSN: 0164-1212, 81: 2386-2395, 2008.

[21] Mordechai Ben-Menachem, Towards management of software as assets: A literature review with additional sources, Information and Software Technology, 50: 241-258, 2008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.08.001

[22] Procaccino, J.D., Verner, J.M., Software project managers and project success: An exploratory study, The Journal of Systems and Software, 79 : 1541-1551, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.01.010

[23] INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/TS 16949, (2009) Quality management systems - Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2008 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations, Third edition 2009-06-15.

[24] ISO 9001:2008, Quality management systems - Requirements.
Published
2013-02-18
How to Cite
KIFOR, Vasile Claudiu; TUDOR, Nicolae. Quality System for Production Software as Tool for Monitoring and Improving Organization KPIs. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 235-246, feb. 2013. ISSN 1841-9844. Available at: <http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/304>. Date accessed: 05 july 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2013.2.304.

Keywords

quality improvement, control, monitoring, efficiency, capability, performance, organization KPI (key performance indicator).