Performance Evaluation of ENUM Name Servers
AbstractENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into Internet URIs. In this paper, we present a performance evaluation of ENUM name servers considering the new requirements and challenges imposed on traditional DNS servers with the incorporation of ENUM protocol. We defined three performance metrics for this performance evaluation: query throughput, response time, and CPU usage. Using a benchmarking testbed, we eval-uated four name servers implementations (BIND, MyDNS-NG, NSD and PowerDNS) in different scenarios considering distinct size of database and types of records being queried. Moreover, we improved the existing methodology for this kind of evaluation, since we identified the limitations of DNSPerf and proposed a new procedure for the evaluation. Results show that BIND and NSD servers achieved a high query throughput with great scalability features. On the other hand, PowerDNS server had a lower throughput and high sensibil-ity to database size. MyDNS-NG server presented a quite low query throughput and poor scalability and, therefore, it is not suitable for ENUM purposes. These results bring to light a new reality for studies of ENUM servers, since they have not been evaluated in such a extended scenarios and size of the database.
 Berners-Lee, T.; Fielding, R.; Masinter, L. (1998); Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax. RFC 2396.
 Bradner, S.; Conroy, L.; Fugiwara, K. (2011); The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application (ENUM). RFC 6116.
 Shen, C.; Schulzrinne, H. (2007); Measurement and Evaluation of ENUM Server Performance. IEEE International Conf. on Communications, ICC 07, 1967-1972.
 Shen, C.; Schulzrinne, H. (2006); Evaluation and Comparison of BIND, PDNS and Navitas as ENUM Server. Technical Report cucs-029-06, Columbia University.
 Tetenyi, I.; Szabo, G.; Kiss, A.; Toth, A. (2008); ENUM in everyday practice. Is it a dream or an opportunity?. Infocommunication Journal, LXIII:48-54.
 Rudinsky, J. (2009); Private ENUM based Number Portability Administrative System Evaluation. International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications Workshops, ICUMT 09, 1-7.
 Lee, H.; Mun, Y. (2004); Performance Evaluation of ENUM Directory Service Design. Lectures Notes in Computer Science; 3038:1124-1130.
 Balakrichenan, S.; Bugnazet, T.; Becker, M. (2007); Studying ENUM Performance with Modeling and Simulation. First Asia Int. Conf. on Modelling Simulation, AMS 07 ; 82-87.
 da Mata, S.H.; Guardieiro, P.R.; Cardoso, A.; Lamounier, E.; Theodoro, L. (2011); Performance Study of ENUM Service Based in Modeling and Simulation. 8th Int. Conf. on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, ICICS 11 ; 1-5.
 da Mata, S. H.; Magalhaes, J. M. H.; Cardoso, A.; Carvalho, H. A.; Guardieiro, P. R. (2013); Performance Comparison of ENUM Name Servers. 22nd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN2013), 1-5.
 Nominum (2007). DNSPerf: DNS Performance Tool Manual.
 Lin, H. et al (2009); VoIP Signalling Performance Requirements and Expectations. Internet Draft.
 Vixie, P. et al (1997); Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE). RFC 2136.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ONLINE OPEN ACCES: Acces to full text of each article and each issue are allowed for free in respect of Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.
You are free to:
-Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
-Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
DISCLAIMER: The author(s) of each article appearing in International Journal of Computers Communications & Control is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; the publication of an article shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute any representation by the Editors or Agora University Press that the data presented therein are original, correct or sufficient to support the conclusions reached or that the experiment design or methodology is adequate.