The Avatar in the Context of Intelligent Social Semantic Web

  • Adrian Brașoveanu Lucian Blaga Univeristy of Sibiu, Romania E-mail:
  • Mariana Nagy Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania
  • Oana Mateuț-Petrișor Agora University, Oradea and R&D Agora Ltd. Cercetare Dezvoltare Agora Oradea, Romania
  • Ramona Urziceanu Agora University, Oradea and R&D Agora Ltd. Cercetare Dezvoltare Agora Oradea, Romania


When the first articles about the SemanticWeb (SW) appeared, there were hardly any signals that the next revolution would be related to social networking. Social networking services (SNS) have grown after MySpace, LinkedIn and Facebook were launched in 2003- 2004 and combine text, images, movies, music, animations and all sorts of lists to create personal presentation pages for users, means to connect to real or virtual friends from all over the world and recommendations based on trust. The rise of the Social Semantic Web and the convergence of different media to create rich experiences is one of the most interesting paradigm shift in the last decades because the probable effect of this movement is the fact that in one day virtual meetings will become legitimate in all aspects of our daily lives (if they are not already). The most important question in this context (the one that we try to answer in this paper) is related to how people will try to shape and use their avatars. In order to understand this, we will study the links between multimodal ontologies, affective interfaces, social data portability and other recent findings. This paper starts with a survey of the current literature of the field, examines some social semantic web mechanisms that changed the way we think about SNs and in the end discusses some methods of connecting emotions with the social semantic web which pose some interesting questions related to the use of avatars. Between conclusions, one of the most interesting is the one that states that the use of affective interfaces adds value to the multimodal ontologies, while another suggests that the avatar must be a mediator between different technologies.


[1] H. Alani, M. Szomszor, C. Cattuto, W. Van den Broeck, G. Correndo, A. Barrat. Live Social Semantics. In: 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), October 2009, US, 2009.

[2] I. Dzitac, B.E. Bărbat. Artificial Intelligence + Distributed Systems = Agents. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, IV, 1, 17-26, (http:llwww.britannica.comlbpsl additionalcontentl18l36182542lArtificial-Intelligence-Distributed-Systems-Agents), 2009.

[3] G. Bente, S. Ruggenberg, N. C. Kramer, F. Eschenburg. Avatar-Mediated Networking: Increasing Social Presence and Interpersonal Trust in Net-Based Collaborations. Human Communication Research 34 (2008) 287-318.

[4] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001, pp. 34-43.

[5] N. Shadbolt, W. Hall, T. Berners-Lee. The Semantic Web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems, pages 96- 101, MaylJune 2006.

[6] T. Berners-Lee, W. Hall, J.A. Hendler, K. O'Hara, N. Shadbolt, D.J. Weitzner. A Framework for Web Science. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 1 (1), pages 1-130, 2006.

[7] U. Boj—ars, A. Passant, J.G. Breslin, S. Decker. Social Networks and Data Portability Using SemanticWeb Technologies. The 2nd Workshop on Social Aspects of the Web (SAW 2008) at the 11th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2008), Innsbruck, Austria, May 2008.

[8] D. M. Boyd, N. B. Ellison. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. In Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1). http:lljcmc.indiana.edulvol13lissue1lboyd.ellison.html, 2007.

[9] V. Bryl, P. Giorgini, and J. Mylopoulos. Designing socio-technical systems: From stakeholder goals to social networks. Requirements Engineering, 14(1):47-70, 2009.

[10] I. Cearreta, J. M. Lopez, N. Garay-Vitoria. Modelling multimodal context-aware affective interaction. Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the Second international conference on ACII'07. Lisbon, Portugal. Pages 57-64, 2007.

[11] J. Euzenat, P. Shvaiko. Ontology Matching, Springer, 2007

[12] B.J. Fogg. Persuasive Technology. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2003.

[13] B.J. Fogg. Mass interpersonal persuasion:An early view of a new phenomenon. In H.Oinas- Kukkonen et al. (Eds.). Persuasive 2008, LNCS 5033 (pp.23-34). New York, Springer, 2008.

[14] T. R. Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199- 220, 1993.

[15] N. Guarino, D. Oberle, S. Staab. What is an Ontology? In S. Staab and R. Studer (eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, Second Edition. International handbooks on information systems. Springer Verlag: 1-17, 2009.

[16] Harth, S. Kinsella, S. Decker. Using Naming Authority to Rank Data and Ontologies for Web Search. In Proc. International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC'09, Washington, USA, October 2009, 2009

[17] D. J. Lewis. Intelligent agents and the Semantic Web. Developing an intelligent Web. Retrieved from 2008. Accessed: December 2009.

[18] F. Limpens, F.Gandon, and M. Buffa. Linking folksonomies and ontologies for supporting knowledge sharing: a state of the art. Technical report, EU Project, ISICIL, 2009.

[19] J. M. Lopez, R. Gil, R. Garcia, I. Cearreta, N. Garay. Towards an Ontology for Describing Emotions. WSKS (1) 2008: 96-104.

[20] P. Messinger, X. Ge, E. Stroulia, K. Lyons, K. Smirnov, M. Bone. On the relationship between my avatar and myself. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 1 (2). http:lljournals.tdl.orgljvwrlarticlelviewl352l. (Accessed December 2009)

[21] P. Mika. Social Networks and The Semantic Web, Springer, 2007

[22] D. Petrelli, S. Mazumdar, A-S. Dadzie, F. Ciravegna. Multivisualization and Dynamic Query for Effective Exploration of Semantic Data. In Proc. International SemanticWeb Conference, ISWC'09,Washington, USA, October 2009, 2009.

[23] L. Razmerita, M. Jusevicius, Rokas Firantas. New Generation of Social Networks Based on Semantic Web Technologies: the Importance of Social Data Portability. In: Workshop on Adaptation and Personalization for Web 2.0, UMAP'09, June 22-26, 2009.

[24] C. Sas, A. Dix, J. Hart, S. Ronghui. Emotional Experience on Facebook Site. In: CHI '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems, 4-9 April 2009, Boston, MA.

[25] R.J.S. Sloan, M. Cook, B. Robinson. Considerations for believable emotional facial expression animation. 2nd International Conference on Visualization, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.

[26] T. VanDerWall. Folksonomy Coinage and Definition. 2007. Retrieved from http:llvanderwal.netlfolksonomy.html. Accessed: December 2009.

[27] M. Webb. 2004. On Social Software. http:llinterconnected.orglhomel2004l04l28l.

[28] S.Y. Yang. Developing an Ontological FAQ System with FAQ Processing and Ranking Techniques for Ubiquitous Services. Proc. of The First IEEE International Conference on Ubi-media Computing, Lanzhou, China, 2008, pp. 541-546.
How to Cite
BRAȘOVEANU, Adrian et al. The Avatar in the Context of Intelligent Social Semantic Web. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 477-482, nov. 2010. ISSN 1841-9844. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 10 aug. 2020. doi:


avatar, Semantic Web (SW), social networking services (SNS), affective interfaces, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)