DOMINO: Trivalent Logic Semantics in Bivalent Syntax Clothes

  • Boldur E. Bărbat "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu Department of Computer Science 5-7 Ion Ra¸tiu St., 550012, Sibiu, ROMANIA

Abstract

The paper describes a rather general software mechanism developed primarily for decision making in dynamic and uncertain environments (typical application: managing overbooking). DOMINO (Decision-Oriented Mechanism for "IF" as Non-deterministic Operator) is meant to deal with undecidability due to any kind of future contingents. Its description here is self-contained but, since a validation is underway within a much broader undertaking involving agent-oriented software, to impair redundancy, several aspects explained in very recent papers are here abridged. In essence, DOMINO acts as an "IF" with enhanced semantics: it can answer "YES", "NO" or "UNDECIDABLE in the time span given" (it renders control to an exception handler). Despite its trivalent logic semantics, it respects the rigours of structural programming and the syntax of bivalent logic (it is programmed in plain C++ to be applicable to legacy systems too). As for most novel approaches, expectations are high, involving a less algorithmic, less probabilistic, less difficult to understand method to treat undecidability in dynamic and uncertain environments, where postponing decisions means keeping open alternatives (to react better to rapid environment changes).

References

[1] AgentLink Roadmap: Overview and Consultation Report, AgentLink III. Agent based computing, University of Southampton, 2004.

[2] Anderson, A.R, N.D. Belnap, J.M. Dunn. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992.

[3] Barbat, B.E. Agent-Oriented Intelligent Systems. Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, 2002 (in Romanian, "Grigore Moisil" Prize of the Romanian Academy).

[4] Barbat, B.E. The Impact of Broad-Band Communication upon HMI Language(s). (Chapter 7.) Communicating in the world of humans and ICTs. (Chapter 8.) in COST Action 269. e-Citizens in the Arena of Social and Political Communication (L. Fortunati, Ed.), pp. 113-142, EUR21803, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2005.

[5] Barbat, B.E., A. Moiceanu, I. Pah. Gödelian Self-Reference in Agent-Oriented Software. Proc. of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on COMPUTERS (ICCOMP '07) (N.E. Mastorakis et al, Eds.), 92-97, Agios Nikolaos, Crete, 2007.

[6] Barbat, B.E, A. Moiceanu, S. Plesca, S.C. Negulescu. Affordability and Paradigms in Agent-Based Systems. Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2007. (In print.)

[7] Barbat, B.E., R.S. Muntean, R. Fabian. Approximation versus Undecidability in Economic Modelling. Proc. of the International Workshop New approaches, Algorithms and Advanced Computational Techniques in Approximation Theory and its Applications (D. Simian, Ed.), 2007. (In print.)

[8] Barbat, B.E., S.C. Negulescu. From Algorithms to (Sub-)Symbolic Inferences in Multi-Agent Systems. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 1, 3, 5-12, 2006. (Paper selected from the Proc. of ICCCC 2006.)

[9] Barbat, B.E., S.C. Negulescu, S. Plesca. Emergence as Leverage and Non-Algorithmic Approaches in Agent-Oriented Software. Studies in Informatics and Control Journal, 16, 4, 2007. (In print.)

[10] Bruntink, M., A. van Deursen, T. Tourwé. Discovering faults in idiom-based exception handling. Proc. of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, 242 - 251, ACM Press, New York, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134320

[11] Castor Filho, F., A. Garcia, C.M.F. Rubira. Error Handling as an Aspect. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Best practices in applying aspect-oriented software development, ACM Press, New York, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1229485.1229486

[12] Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., Rhodes, C. Organizational ethics, decision making, undecidability. The Sociological Review, 55, 2, 393-409(17), Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

[13] FIPA TC Agent Management. FIPA Agent Management Specification. Standard SC00023K (2004/18/03). http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00023/SC00023K.pdf, 2004.

[14] Fisher, M. Temporal Development Methods for Agent-Based Systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 10, 41-66, Springer Science + Business Media Inc., 2005.

[15] Gottwald, S. Many-valued Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (E.N. Zalta, Ed.). http://plato. stanford.edu/entries/logic-manyvalued/, 2004.

[16] Rabinovich, A. Temporal logics with incommensurable distances are undecidable. Information and Computation, 205, 5, 707-715, Elsevier, 2007.

[17] Refsgaard, J.C. et al. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software, 1543-1556, Elsevier, 2007.

[18] Weisstein, E.W. Three-Valued Logic. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld. Wolfram.com/Three-ValuedLogic.html. CRC Press LLC, Wolfram Research, 1999.

[19] Zambonelli, F., A. Omicini. Challenges and Research Directions in Agent-Oriented Software Engineering. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 9, 253-283, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
Published
2007-04-01
How to Cite
BĂRBAT, Boldur E.. DOMINO: Trivalent Logic Semantics in Bivalent Syntax Clothes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 303-313, apr. 2007. ISSN 1841-9844. Available at: <http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/2362>. Date accessed: 11 july 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2007.3.2362.

Keywords

undecidability; open, heterogeneous, dynamic and uncertain environments (OHDUE); decision-making; trivalent logic semantics; agent-oriented software engineering