A Metrics-based Diagnosis Tool for Enhancing Innovation Capabilities in SMEs
AbstractInnovation doubtless represents a main strategic lever for the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in many industrial sectors and it comprises new techniques, new products and new processes, as well as new services which lead to better customer service and revenue. However, the basic question of how well the company is equipped with the necessary practices, methodologies, people, and beliefs, is far from being completely answered yet. In this paper, a metrics-based diagnosis tool for measuring and enhancing the innovation capabilities in SMEs is presented along with a set of preliminary results from case-based studies at the local industry. In this paper we propose a new method by studying the competences of SMEs in concepts tied to innovation and by using a specified framework. As a first step, all of the necessary information by using questionnaires with verbal-scales evaluations is compiled. Second, we use a non-compensatory flow-based sorting method with central profiles to identify the current level and to classify the company into predefined levels. Third, a detailed analysis of the obtained values is performed in order to make a personalized recommendation.
 Koberg C., Detienne D., Heppard k.,An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation, Journal of High Technology Management Research 14 p 21-45, 2002
 Adams, R., Bessant, J., Phelps, R., Innovation management measurement: A review, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol 8 , nş1, p. 21-47. 2006
 Bremser W., Barsky N., Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D 5 performance measurement, Management vol 34 nş3, p. 229-238, 2004
 Wang C.,Lu I., Chen I, Evaluating firm technological innovation 15 capability under uncertainty, Technovation vol 28, p. 349-, 2008
 Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., Voss, C.A., Development of a technical innovation audit, Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (2), p 105-136, 1996
 Becheikh N., Landry, R., Amara, N., Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003, Technovation, vol 26, nş5-6, p. 644-664,2005
 Cormican k.,Sullivan D.,Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management, Technovation vol 24, p. 819-829, 2004
 Boly, V., Ingénierie de l'innovation : organisation et methodologies des entreprises innovantes, Lavoisier, Paris, France, 2004
 Corona A. José Ramón, Innovation et metrologie : une approche en terme d'Indice d'Innovation Potentielle, Thčse de Doctorat, Institut Nationale Polytechnique de Lorraine, février, 2005
 Godet, M., Manuel de prospective stratégique. Tome 2. L'art et la methode, Ed. Dunod, Paris, France, 1997
 Morel L., Camargo M.,Comparison of multicriteria analysis techniques to improve the innovation process measurement, IAMOT 2006, Beijing, China, 8 pages, may 22-26
 Assielou G, Metrologie des processus d'innovation, thčse de Doctorat, Institut Nationale Polytechnique de Lorraine, 2008
 Camargo M., Morel L., Fonteix C., Evolutionary based methodology to integrate product innovation degree on a firm technological strategy, IAMOT 2007 Proceedings
 Nemery P, Lamboray C. FlowSort: a flow-based sorting method with limiting or central profiles, TOP 16:90-113, Springer-Verlag, 2008
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ONLINE OPEN ACCES: Acces to full text of each article and each issue are allowed for free in respect of Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.
You are free to:
-Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
-Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
DISCLAIMER: The author(s) of each article appearing in International Journal of Computers Communications & Control is/are solely responsible for the content thereof; the publication of an article shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute any representation by the Editors or Agora University Press that the data presented therein are original, correct or sufficient to support the conclusions reached or that the experiment design or methodology is adequate.