A Fuzzy Logic Software Instrument and a New Scale for the Assessment of Creativity

Ioan Susnea, Grigore Vasiliu


It is difficult to measure something we cannot clearly define. No wonder hat, for the over 100 definitions of the creativity proposed in the literature, there re almost as many scales and assessment tools. Most of these instruments have been esigned for research purposes, and are difficult to apply and score, especially in the ducational environment. Not to mention that they are expensive. he research described in this paper is aimed to develop a free, fast, and easy to se software tool for the assessment of creativity in the educational context. To this urpose, we have designed a new scale with 20 items, based on a novel approach ocusing on detecting the factors known to block the creativity, like stereotypical hinking, and social conformity. The user input is collected through a web based nterface, and the actual interpretation of the results is automated by means of a uzzy logic algorithm. The proposed solution is interesting because it can be easily ntegrated in almost any e-learning platform, or used as a stand-alone tool for tracing he evolution of the students involved in courses for the development of creative hinking skills, and also for possible other applications.


assessment of creativity, e-learning, fuzzy logic

Full Text:



Aleinikov, A., Kackmeister, S., and Koenig, R. (Eds.). (2000); Creating creativity: 101definitions, idland, MI: Alden B. Dow Creativity Center, Northwoods University.

Amabile, T.M. (1982); Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique, ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 997-1013.

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, M. (1996);

Assessing the ork environment for creativity, Academy of management journal, 39(5): 1154-1184.

Batey, M. (2012); The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction f a new heuristic framework, Creativity Research Journal, 24(1): 55-65.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., and Rumble, . (2012); Defining twenty-first century skills, Assessment and teaching of 21st century kills, Springer Netherlands, 17-66.

Bull, K.S. & Davis, G.A. (1980);

Evaluating creative potential using the statement of past reative activities, Journal of Creative Behavior, 14: 249-257.

Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Kearney, C., Punie, Y., Van den Berghe, W.,and Wastiau, P. (2009); reativity in schools in Europe: A survey of teachers in Europe, European Commission-Joint esearch Center-Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.

Carson, S., Peterson, J.B.,& Higgins, D.M. (2005);

Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure f the Creative Achievement Questionnaire, Creativity Research Journal, 17(1): 37-50.

Dzitac, I., Vesselenyi, T., Tarca, R. C. (2011);

Identification of ERD using fuzzy inference ystems for brain-computer interface, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 6(3): 403-417.

Fields, Z., & Bisschoff, C. A. (2014);

Developing and Assessing a Tool to Measure the reativity of University Students, J Soc Sci, 38(1): 23-31.

Florida, R. (2006); The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for alent. Liberal Education, 92(3): 22-29.

Kasof, J. (1995); Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective, Creativity Research ournal, 8:311-366.

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008); Essentials of creativity assessment, John iley & Sons, 53.

Kelly, K.E. (2004); A brief measure of creativity among college students. College Student ournal, 38: 594-596.

Kim, K. H. (2006); Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative hinking (TTCT), Creativity research journal, 18(1): 3-14.

Kirton, M. (1976); Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied sychology, 61: 622-629

Kumar, V. K., Kemmler, D., & Holman, E. R. (1997); The Creativity Styles Questionnaire– evised. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1): 51-58.

Miller, A. L. (2009), Cognitive processes associated with creativity: Scale development and alidation (Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University).

Miller, A. L. (2014); A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity, reativity Research Journal, 26(2): 203-218.

Parkhurst, H. B. (1999); Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a onstruct, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(1): 1-21.

Plucker, J.A., Runco, M.A. (1998);

The death of creativity measurement has been greatly xaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment, oeper Review, 21: 36-40.

Resnick, M. (2007); Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society, International Society for echnology in Education, 35(4): 18-22

Robinson, K. (2011); Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Capstone

Runco, M.A. (1999); Appendix II: Tests of creativity. In M.A. Runco and S.R. Pritzker ds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 755-760).

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001); Development and psychometric integrity f a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4): 393-400.

Sawyer, R. K. (2011); Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation, Oxford niversity Press.

Susnea, I., Pecheanu, E., Tudorie, C. and Cocu, A. (2014); The education for creativity - he only student's tool for coping with the uncertainties of the future, MAC ETEL 2014 - nternational Conference on Education, Teaching and e-Learning, Prague , Oct. 2014.

Susnea, I. Pecheanu, E. Tudorie, C. (2014); Initiatives towards and Education for Creativity, he 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 Education Facing Contemporary World ssues, 7th - 9th November 2014. Also published in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 015 180: 1520 - 1526.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988); A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The ature of creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125-147.

Tanaka, K. (1997); An introduction to fuzzy logic for practical applications, Springer Verlag.

Thorsteinsson, G., Page, T., & Niculescu, A. (2010); Adoption of ICT in supporting ideation kills in conventional classroom settings, Journal of Studies in Informatics and Control, 9(3): 309-318.

Torrance, E. P. (1974); Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms and technical manual. ensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Press

Treffinger, D. J. (1996); Creativity, creative thinking, and critical thinking: In search of efinitions. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2192

Copyright (c) 2017 Ioan Susnea, Grigore Vasiliu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

CC-BY-NC  License for Website User

Articles published in IJCCC user license are protected by copyright.

Users can access, download, copy, translate the IJCCC articles for non-commercial purposes provided that users, but cannot redistribute, display or adapt:

  • Cite the article using an appropriate bibliographic citation: author(s), article title, journal, volume, issue, page numbers, year of publication, DOI, and the link to the definitive published version on IJCCC website;
  • Maintain the integrity of the IJCCC article;
  • Retain the copyright notices and links to these terms and conditions so it is clear to other users what can and what cannot be done with the  article;
  • Ensure that, for any content in the IJCCC article that is identified as belonging to a third party, any re-use complies with the copyright policies of that third party;
  • Any translations must prominently display the statement: "This is an unofficial translation of an article that appeared in IJCCC. Agora University  has not endorsed this translation."

This is a non commercial license where the use of published articles for commercial purposes is forbiden. 

Commercial purposes include: 

  • Copying or downloading IJCCC articles, or linking to such postings, for further redistribution, sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Copying, downloading or posting by a site or service that incorporates advertising with such content;
  • The inclusion or incorporation of article content in other works or services (other than normal quotations with an appropriate citation) that is then available for sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Use of IJCCC articles or article content (other than normal quotations with appropriate citation) by for-profit organizations for promotional purposes, whether for a fee or otherwise;
  • Use for the purposes of monetary reward by means of sale, resale, license, loan, transfer or other form of commercial exploitation;

    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[End of CC-BY-NC  License for Website User]

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL (IJCCC), With Emphasis on the Integration of Three Technologies (C & C & C),  ISSN 1841-9836.

IJCCC was founded in 2006,  at Agora University, by  Ioan DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief),  Florin Gheorghe FILIP (Editor-in-Chief), and  Misu-Jan MANOLESCU (Managing Editor).

Ethics: This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Ioan  DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief) at COPE European Seminar, Bruxelles, 2015:

IJCCC is covered/indexed/abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded (since vol.1(S),  2006); JCR2018: IF=1.585..

IJCCC is indexed in Scopus from 2008 (CiteScore2018 = 1.56):

Nomination by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award Romania 2015 (SNIP2014 = 1.029): Elsevier/ Scopus

IJCCC was nominated by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award - "Scopus Awards Romania 2015" (SNIP2014 = 1.029).

IJCCC is in Top 3 of 157 Romanian journals indexed by Scopus (in all fields) and No.1 in Computer Science field by Elsevier/ Scopus.


 Impact Factor in JCR2018 (Clarivate Analytics/SCI Expanded/ISI Web of Science): IF=1.585 (Q3). Scopus: CiteScore2018=1.56 (Q2);

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Editors-in-Chief: Ioan DZITAC & Florin Gheorghe FILIP.