A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection

  • Zenonas Turskis
  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
  • Jurgita Antucheviciene
  • Natalja Kosareva


The purpose of this article is to propose a fuzzy multi-attribute perfor- mance measurement (MAPM) framework using the merits of both a novel Weighted Aggregated Sum-Product Assessment method with Fuzzy values (WASPAS-F) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The object of this study is to select the best shopping centre construction site in Vilnius. A number of conflicting qualitative and quantitative attributes exist for evaluating alternative construction sites. Qualitative attributes are accompanied by ambiguities and vagueness. This makes fuzzy logic a more natural approach to this kind of multi-attribute decision making (MADM) prob- lems. Fuzzy AHP is applied for assigning weights of the attributes and WASPAS-F method is used to determine the most suitable alternative.


[1] Aristotle (1990); Ethica Nicomachea, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Originally published in 350bc, English edition by I. Bywater.

[2] Bernoulli, D. (1954); Specimen theoriae novae de mensurasortis, Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Econometrica, 22: 23-36.

[3] Borda, J. C. (1781); Mémoiresur les élections au scrutiny, Comptesrendus de l'Académie des sciences, traduit par Alfred de Graziacomme Mathematical Derivation of an election system, 44: 42-51.

[4] Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. (1944); Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[5] Fishburn, P.C. (1970); Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.

[6] Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H. (1976); Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[7] Zeleny, M. (1982); Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.

[8] Zimmermann, H. J. (2000); An application-oriented view of modelling uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 122: 190-198.

[9] Zadeh, L. A. (1965); Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8(3): 338-353.

[10] Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part I, Information Science, 8(3): 199-249

[11] Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part II, Information Science, 8(4): 301-357.

[12] Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part III, Information Science, 9(1): 43-80.

[13] Aydin, N. Y.; Kentel, E.; Duzgun, H. S. (2013); GIS-based site selection methodology for hybrid renewable energy systems: A case study from western Turkey, Energy Conversion and Management, 70: 90-106.

[14] Chatterjee, N.; Bose, G. (2013); A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm, Decision Science Letters, 2(1): 1-10.

[15] Sánchez-Lozano, J. M.; Teruel-Solano, J.; Soto-Elvira, P. L.; García-Cascales, M. S. (2013); Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24: 544-556.

[16] Kim, Y.; Chung, E. S.; Jun, S. M.; Kim, S. U. (2013); Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73: 23-32.

[17] Liu, H. C.; You, J. X.; Fan, X. J.; Chen, Y. Z. (2014); Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment, Applied Soft Computing, 21: 453-461.

[18] García, J. L.; Alvarado, A.; Blanco, J.; JimĂŠnez, E.; Maldonado, A. A.; CortĂŠs, G.(2014); Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an analytic hierarchy process, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 100: 60-69.

[19] Uyan, M. (2013); GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 11-17.

[20] Devi, K.; Yadav, S. P. (2013); A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9-12): 1219-1229.

[21] Erol, İ.; Sencer, S.; Özmen, A.; Searcy, C. (2014); Fuzzy MCDM framework for locating a nuclear power plant in Turkey, Energy Policy, 67: 186-197.

[22] Wang, J. C.; Chen, T. Y. (2014); A closeness coefficient-based multiple criteria decisionmaking method using interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its application to watershed site selection, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31(1): 1-16. A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection 887

[23] Fetanat, A.; Khorasaninejad, E. (2015); A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran, Ocean & Coastal Management, 109: 17-28.

[24] Dubois, D.; Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers, International Journal of Systems Sciences, 9: 613-626.

[25] Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.; Pedrycz, W. (1983); A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(3): 229-241.

[26] Likert, R. (1932); A Technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of Psychology, 140: 1-55.

[27] Allen, E.; Seaman, C. A. (2007); Likert Scales and Data Analyses, Quality Progress, 40: 64-65.

[28] Chang, D.-Y. (1996); Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649-655.

[29] Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J.; Zakarevicius, A. (2012); Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering = Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6): 3-6.

[30] Zavadskas, E.K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Hajiagha, S. H. R.; Hashemi, S. S. (2014); Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF), Applied Soft Computing, 24: 1013-1021.

[31] Bagočius, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. (2014); Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4): 590-599.

[32] Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Aghdaie, M. H.; Derakhti, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Varzandeh, M.H.M. (2013); Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating, Expert Systems with Applications, 40: 7111-7121.

[33] Vafaeipour, M.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Varzandeh, M.H.M.; Derakhti, A.; Eshkalag, M.K. (2014); Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi - criteria decision making approach, Energy Conversion and Management, 86: 653-663.

[34] Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Saparauskas, J.; Turskis, Z. (2013); MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(2): 5-20.

[35] Dejus, T.; Antuchevičien˙e, J. (2013); Assessment of health and safety solutions at a construction site, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(5): 728-737.

[36] Šiožinyt˙e, E.; Antuchevičien˙e, J. (2013); Solving the problems of daylighting and tradition continuity in a reconstructed vernacular building, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(6): 873-882.

[37] Bitarafan, M.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Arefi, S.L.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2014); Evaluation of real-time intelligent sensors for structural health monitoring of bridges based on SWARA-WASPAS; a case in Iran, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9(4): 333-340.

[38] Chakraborty, S.; Zavadskas, E.K. (2014); Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making, Informatica, 25(1): 1-20.

[39] Lashgari, S.; Antucheviciene, J.; Delavari, A; Kheirkhah, O. (2014); Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(4): 729-743.

[40] Zavadskas, E. K.; Skibniewski, M. J.; Antucheviciene, J. (2014); Performance analysis of civil engineering journals based on the Web of Science database, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 14(4): 519-527.

[41] MacCrimon, K. R. (1968); Decision Marking Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach, RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.

[42] Easton, A. (1973); One of a kind decisions involving weighted multiple objectives and disparate alternatives, in J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 657-667, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina
How to Cite
TURSKIS, Zenonas et al. A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. 113-128, oct. 2015. ISSN 1841-9844. Available at: <http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/2078>. Date accessed: 29 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078.


AHP, WASPAS-F, Fuzzy AHP, multi-attribute decision making (MADM), key performance attributes, construction site, shopping centre