A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection

Zenonas Turskis, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Jurgita Antucheviciene, Natalja Kosareva


The purpose of this article is to propose a fuzzy multi-attribute perfor- mance measurement (MAPM) framework using the merits of both a novel Weighted Aggregated Sum-Product Assessment method with Fuzzy values (WASPAS-F) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The object of this study is to select the best shopping centre construction site in Vilnius. A number of conflicting qualitative and quantitative attributes exist for evaluating alternative construction sites. Qualitative attributes are accompanied by ambiguities and vagueness. This makes fuzzy logic a more natural approach to this kind of multi-attribute decision making (MADM) prob- lems. Fuzzy AHP is applied for assigning weights of the attributes and WASPAS-F method is used to determine the most suitable alternative.


AHP, WASPAS-F, Fuzzy AHP, multi-attribute decision making (MADM), key performance attributes, construction site, shopping centre

Full Text:



Aristotle (1990); Ethica Nicomachea, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Originally published in 350bc, English edition by I. Bywater.

Bernoulli, D. (1954); Specimen theoriae novae de mensurasortis, Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Econometrica, 22: 23-36.

Borda, J. C. (1781); Mémoiresur les élections au scrutiny, Comptesrendus de l'Académie des sciences, traduit par Alfred de Graziacomme Mathematical Derivation of an election system, 44: 42-51.

Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. (1944); Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Fishburn, P.C. (1970); Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.

Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H. (1976); Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Zeleny, M. (1982); Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Zimmermann, H. J. (2000); An application-oriented view of modelling uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 122: 190-198.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965); Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8(3): 338-353.

Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part I, Information Science, 8(3): 199-249

Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part II, Information Science, 8(4): 301-357.

Zadeh, L. A. (1975); Fuzzy logic and its application to approximate reasoning, Part III, Information Science, 9(1): 43-80.

Aydin, N. Y.; Kentel, E.; Duzgun, H. S. (2013); GIS-based site selection methodology for hybrid renewable energy systems: A case study from western Turkey, Energy Conversion and Management, 70: 90-106.

Chatterjee, N.; Bose, G. (2013); A COPRAS-F base multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm, Decision Science Letters, 2(1): 1-10.

Sánchez-Lozano, J. M.; Teruel-Solano, J.; Soto-Elvira, P. L.; García-Cascales, M. S. (2013); Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24: 544-556.

Kim, Y.; Chung, E. S.; Jun, S. M.; Kim, S. U. (2013); Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73: 23-32.

Liu, H. C.; You, J. X.; Fan, X. J.; Chen, Y. Z. (2014); Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment, Applied Soft Computing, 21: 453-461.

García, J. L.; Alvarado, A.; Blanco, J.; JimĂŠnez, E.; Maldonado, A. A.; CortĂŠs, G.(2014); Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an analytic hierarchy process, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 100: 60-69.

Uyan, M. (2013); GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 11-17.

Devi, K.; Yadav, S. P. (2013); A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9-12): 1219-1229.

Erol, İ.; Sencer, S.; Özmen, A.; Searcy, C. (2014); Fuzzy MCDM framework for locating a nuclear power plant in Turkey, Energy Policy, 67: 186-197.

Wang, J. C.; Chen, T. Y. (2014); A closeness coefficient-based multiple criteria decisionmaking method using interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its application to watershed site selection, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31(1): 1-16. A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection 887

Fetanat, A.; Khorasaninejad, E. (2015); A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran, Ocean & Coastal Management, 109: 17-28.

Dubois, D.; Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers, International Journal of Systems Sciences, 9: 613-626.

Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.; Pedrycz, W. (1983); A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(3): 229-241.

Likert, R. (1932); A Technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of Psychology, 140: 1-55.

Allen, E.; Seaman, C. A. (2007); Likert Scales and Data Analyses, Quality Progress, 40: 64-65.

Chang, D.-Y. (1996); Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649-655.

Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J.; Zakarevicius, A. (2012); Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering = Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6): 3-6.

Zavadskas, E.K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Hajiagha, S. H. R.; Hashemi, S. S. (2014); Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF), Applied Soft Computing, 24: 1013-1021.

Bagočius, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. (2014); Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4): 590-599.

Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Aghdaie, M. H.; Derakhti, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Varzandeh, M.H.M. (2013); Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating, Expert Systems with Applications, 40: 7111-7121.

Vafaeipour, M.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Varzandeh, M.H.M.; Derakhti, A.; Eshkalag, M.K. (2014); Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi - criteria decision making approach, Energy Conversion and Management, 86: 653-663.

Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Saparauskas, J.; Turskis, Z. (2013); MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(2): 5-20.

Dejus, T.; Antuchevičien˙e, J. (2013); Assessment of health and safety solutions at a construction site, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(5): 728-737.

Šiožinyt˙e, E.; Antuchevičien˙e, J. (2013); Solving the problems of daylighting and tradition continuity in a reconstructed vernacular building, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(6): 873-882.

Bitarafan, M.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Arefi, S.L.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2014); Evaluation of real-time intelligent sensors for structural health monitoring of bridges based on SWARA-WASPAS; a case in Iran, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9(4): 333-340.

Chakraborty, S.; Zavadskas, E.K. (2014); Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making, Informatica, 25(1): 1-20.

Lashgari, S.; Antucheviciene, J.; Delavari, A; Kheirkhah, O. (2014); Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(4): 729-743.

Zavadskas, E. K.; Skibniewski, M. J.; Antucheviciene, J. (2014); Performance analysis of civil engineering journals based on the Web of Science database, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 14(4): 519-527.

MacCrimon, K. R. (1968); Decision Marking Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach, RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.

Easton, A. (1973); One of a kind decisions involving weighted multiple objectives and disparate alternatives, in J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 657-667, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078

Copyright (c) 2017 Zenonas Turskis, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Jurgita Antucheviciene, Natalja Kosareva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

IJCCC is an Open Access Journal : CC-BY-NC.

Articles published in IJCCC user license are protected by copyright.

Users can access, download, copy, translate the IJCCC articles for non-commercial purposes provided that users, but cannot redistribute, display or adapt:

  • Cite the article using an appropriate bibliographic citation: author(s), article title, journal, volume, issue, page numbers, year of publication, DOI, and the link to the definitive published version on IJCCC website;
  • Maintain the integrity of the IJCCC article;
  • Retain the copyright notices and links to these terms and conditions so it is clear to other users what can and what cannot be done with the  article;
  • Ensure that, for any content in the IJCCC article that is identified as belonging to a third party, any re-use complies with the copyright policies of that third party;
  • Any translations must prominently display the statement: "This is an unofficial translation of an article that appeared in IJCCC. Agora University  has not endorsed this translation."

This is a non commercial license where the use of published articles for commercial purposes is forbiden. 

Commercial purposes include: 

  • Copying or downloading IJCCC articles, or linking to such postings, for further redistribution, sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Copying, downloading or posting by a site or service that incorporates advertising with such content;
  • The inclusion or incorporation of article content in other works or services (other than normal quotations with an appropriate citation) that is then available for sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Use of IJCCC articles or article content (other than normal quotations with appropriate citation) by for-profit organizations for promotional purposes, whether for a fee or otherwise;
  • Use for the purposes of monetary reward by means of sale, resale, license, loan, transfer or other form of commercial exploitation;

    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[End of CC-BY-NC  License for Website User]

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL (IJCCC), With Emphasis on the Integration of Three Technologies (C & C & C),  ISSN 1841-9836.

IJCCC was founded in 2006,  at Agora University, by  Ioan DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief),  Florin Gheorghe FILIP (Editor-in-Chief), and  Misu-Jan MANOLESCU (Managing Editor).

Ethics: This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Ioan  DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief) at COPE European Seminar, Bruxelles, 2015:

IJCCC is covered/indexed/abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded (since vol.1(S),  2006); JCR2018: IF=1.585..

IJCCC is indexed in Scopus from 2008 (CiteScore2018 = 1.56):

Nomination by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award Romania 2015 (SNIP2014 = 1.029): Elsevier/ Scopus

IJCCC was nominated by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award - "Scopus Awards Romania 2015" (SNIP2014 = 1.029).

IJCCC is in Top 3 of 157 Romanian journals indexed by Scopus (in all fields) and No.1 in Computer Science field by Elsevier/ Scopus.


 Impact Factor in JCR2018 (Clarivate Analytics/SCI Expanded/ISI Web of Science): IF=1.585 (Q3). Scopus: CiteScore2018=1.56 (Q2);

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Editors-in-Chief: Ioan DZITAC & Florin Gheorghe FILIP.