A Multi-criteria Picture Fuzzy Decision-making Model for Green Supplier Selection based on Fractional Programming

Guo Cao


Due to the increasing complexity in green supplier selection, there would be some important issues for expressing inherent uncertainty or imprecision of decision makers’ cognitive information in decision making process. As an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and neutrosophic sets (NSs), picture fuzzy sets (PFSs) can better model and represent the hesitancy and uncertainty of decision makers’ preference information. In this study, an attempt has been made to present a multi-criteria picture fuzzy decision-making model for green supplier selection based on fractional programming. In this approach, the ratings of alternatives and weights of criteria are represented by PFSs and IFSs, respectively. Based on the available information, some pairs of fractional programming models are derived from the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the proposed biparametric picture fuzzy distance measure to determine the relative closeness coefficient intervals of green suppliers, which are aggregated for the criteria to generate the ranking order of all green suppliers by computing their optimal degrees of membership based on the ranking method of interval numbers. Finally, an example is conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed multi-criteria decision making (MCMD) method.


multi-criteria decision making (MCMD), picture fuzzy sets (PFSs), fractional programming, biparametric picture fuzzy distance measure, green supplier selection.

Full Text:



Abdel-Basset, M.; Manogaran, G.; Gamal, A.; Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria, Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 22, 257-278, 2018.

Akcan, S.; Tas, M. A. (2019). Green supplier evaluation with SWARA -TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191: 736, 2019.

Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87--96, 1986.

Banaeian, N.; Mobli, H.; Fahimnia, B.; Nielsen, I. E. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods, a case study from the agri-food industry, Computers & Operations Research, 89(1), 337--347, 2018.

Boran, F. E.; Akay, D. (2014). A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition, Information Sciences, 255, 45-57, 2014.

Celik, E.; Erdogan, M.; Gumus, A. T. (2016). An extended fuzzy TOPSIS-GRA method based on different separation measures for green logistics service provider selection, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(5), 1377-1392, 2016.

Cuong, B. C.; Kreinovich, V. (2013). Picture Fuzzy Sets-a new concept for computational intelligence problems, 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT 2013), 12: 1-6, 2013.

Dzitac, I.; Filip, F.G.; Manolescu, M.J. (2017). Fuzzy Logic Is Not Fuzzy: World-renowned Computer Scientist Lofti A. Zadeh, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 12(6), 748-789, 2017.

Eda, B.; Zahir, I.; Cengiz, K. (2018). Pythagorean fuzzy CODAS and its application to supplier selection in a manufacturing firm, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(4), 550- 564, 2018.

Fallahpour, A.; Olugu, E. U.; Musa, S. N.; Dariush, K.; Kuan, Y. W. (2016) An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach, Neural Computing & Applications, 27(3), 707-725, 2016.

Gao, H. X.; Ju, Y. B.; Ernesto, S. G.; Zhang, W. K. (2020). Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: An approach based on consensus decision making, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118781, 2020.

Garg, H.; Arora, R. (2018). A nonlinear-programming methodology for multi- attribute decision making problem with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets information, Applied Intelligence, 48, 2031--2046, 2018.

Gitinavard, H.; Ghaderi, H.; Pishvaee, M. S. (2018). Green supplier evaluation in manufacturing systems: a novel interval-valued hesitant fuzzy group outranking approach, Soft Computing, 3, 1-20, 2018.

Govindan, K.; Sivakumar, R. (2016). Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches, Annals of Operations Research, 238, 243--276, 2016.

Karsak, E. E.; Dursun, M. (2015). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82: 82--93, 2015.

Li, J; Wang, J. Q. (2017). An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(6), 1866- 1879, 2017.

Liu, H. C.; Quan, M. Y.; Li, Z. W.; Wang, Z. L. (2019). A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment, Information Sciences, 486, 254-270, 2019.

Liu, P. D.; Gao, H.; Ma, J. H. (2019). Novel green supplier selection method by combining quality function deployment with partitioned Bonferroni mean operator in interval type-2 fuzzy environment, Information Sciences, 490, 292--316, 2019.

Liu, P.; Wang, Y. (2014). Multiple attribute decision making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean, Neural Computing & Applications, 25:2001- -2010, 2014.

Lo, H. W.; Liou, J. J. H.; Wang, H. S.; Tsai, Y. S. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 190(20), 339-352, 2018.

Memaria, A.; Dargib, A.; Jokara, M. R. A.; Ahmadc, R.; Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9--24, 2019.

Mousakhani, S.; Nazari-Shirkouhi, S.; Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2017). A novel interval type-2 fuzzy evaluation model based group decision analysis for green supplier selection problems: A case study of battery industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 205-218, 2017.

Pravin, K.; Rajesh, S. K.; Anurika, V. (2017). Suppliers' green performance evaluation using fuzzy extended ELECTRE approach, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19, 809--821, 2017.

Rouyendegh, B. D.; Yildizbasi, A.; Üstünyer, P. (2019). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem, Soft Computing, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019- 04054-8, 2019.

Shen, L. X.; Olfat, L.; Govindan, K.; Khodaverdi, R.; Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier' s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 74, 170-179, 2013.

Son, L. H. (2015). DPFCM, A novel distributed picture fuzzy clustering method on picture fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 51-66, 2015.

Wang, L.; Zhang, H. Y.; Wang, J. Q.; Li, L. (2017). Picture fuzzy normalized projection based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project, Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216--226, 2017.

Wu, J.; Liu, Y. J. (2013). An approach for multiple attribute group decision making problems with interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 311--324, 2013.

Wu, Q.; Zhou, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H. Y. (2019). An integrated approach to green supplier selection based on the interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods, Information Sciences, 502, 394-417, 2019.

Xu, Z. S. (2011). A ranking arithmetic for fuzzy mutual complementary judgment matrices, Journal of Systems Engineering, 16 (4), 311-314, 2001.

Xu, Z. S.; Da, Q. L. (2003). A likelihood based method for priorities of interval judgment matrices, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 11, 63--65, 2003.

Zeng, S. Z.; Chen, S. M.; Wei, K. L. (2019). Multi-attribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method, Information Sciences, 488, 76--92, 2019.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2020.1.3762

Copyright (c) 2020 Guo Cao

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

CC-BY-NC  License for Website User

Articles published in IJCCC user license are protected by copyright.

Users can access, download, copy, translate the IJCCC articles for non-commercial purposes provided that users, but cannot redistribute, display or adapt:

  • Cite the article using an appropriate bibliographic citation: author(s), article title, journal, volume, issue, page numbers, year of publication, DOI, and the link to the definitive published version on IJCCC website;
  • Maintain the integrity of the IJCCC article;
  • Retain the copyright notices and links to these terms and conditions so it is clear to other users what can and what cannot be done with the  article;
  • Ensure that, for any content in the IJCCC article that is identified as belonging to a third party, any re-use complies with the copyright policies of that third party;
  • Any translations must prominently display the statement: "This is an unofficial translation of an article that appeared in IJCCC. Agora University  has not endorsed this translation."

This is a non commercial license where the use of published articles for commercial purposes is forbiden. 

Commercial purposes include: 

  • Copying or downloading IJCCC articles, or linking to such postings, for further redistribution, sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Copying, downloading or posting by a site or service that incorporates advertising with such content;
  • The inclusion or incorporation of article content in other works or services (other than normal quotations with an appropriate citation) that is then available for sale or licensing, for a fee;
  • Use of IJCCC articles or article content (other than normal quotations with appropriate citation) by for-profit organizations for promotional purposes, whether for a fee or otherwise;
  • Use for the purposes of monetary reward by means of sale, resale, license, loan, transfer or other form of commercial exploitation;

    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

[End of CC-BY-NC  License for Website User]

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL (IJCCC), With Emphasis on the Integration of Three Technologies (C & C & C),  ISSN 1841-9836.

IJCCC was founded in 2006,  at Agora University, by  Ioan DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief),  Florin Gheorghe FILIP (Editor-in-Chief), and  Misu-Jan MANOLESCU (Managing Editor).

Ethics: This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Ioan  DZITAC (Editor-in-Chief) at COPE European Seminar, Bruxelles, 2015:

IJCCC is covered/indexed/abstracted in Science Citation Index Expanded (since vol.1(S),  2006); JCR2018: IF=1.585..

IJCCC is indexed in Scopus from 2008 (CiteScore2018 = 1.56):

Nomination by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award Romania 2015 (SNIP2014 = 1.029): Elsevier/ Scopus

IJCCC was nominated by Elsevier for Journal Excellence Award - "Scopus Awards Romania 2015" (SNIP2014 = 1.029).

IJCCC is in Top 3 of 157 Romanian journals indexed by Scopus (in all fields) and No.1 in Computer Science field by Elsevier/ Scopus.


 Impact Factor in JCR2018 (Clarivate Analytics/SCI Expanded/ISI Web of Science): IF=1.585 (Q3). Scopus: CiteScore2018=1.56 (Q2);

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Editors-in-Chief: Ioan DZITAC & Florin Gheorghe FILIP.